Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
[[File:Franz_Xaver_Winterhalter_Napoleon_III.jpg|thumbnail|left|300px250px|Franz Xaver Winterhalter, French Emperor Napoleon III]] __NOTOC__ In 1862, French Emperor Napoleon III maneuvered to establish a French client state in Mexico, and eventually installed Maximilian of Habsburg, Archduke of Austria, as Emperor of Mexico. Stiff Mexican resistance caused Napoleon III to order French withdrawal in 1867, a decision strongly encouraged by a United States recovered from its Civil War weakness in foreign affairs. Earlier, during the Civil War, U.S. Secretary of State William Henry Seward followed a more cautious policy that attempted to keep relations with France harmonious and prevent French willingness to assist the Confederacy. Consequently, Maximilian’s government rebuffed Confederate diplomatic overtures.
In 1857Earlier, Mexico became embroiled in a civil war that pitted during the forces of Liberal reformist Benito Juárez against Conservatives led by Félix Zuloaga. Conservatives exerted control from Mexico CityCivil War, and the Liberals from VeracruzU. The United States recognized the Juárez government in 1859, and in January of 1861, Liberal forces captured Mexico City, greatly strengthening Juárez’s position and legitimacy. However, continued instability had coincided with growing foreign debt that was increasingly difficult for the Mexican government to payS. Secretary of State William Henry Seward offered followed a plan more cautious policy that would provide mining concessions in exchange for American loans. In the event that the debts were not repaid, Mexico would agree attempted to the cession of Baja California keep relations with France harmonious and other Mexican states. The terms of the loan were onerous prevent French willingness to assist the Mexican government, but UConfederacy.S. diplomat Thomas Corwin successfully negotiated a treaty with Mexican representative Manuel Maria Zamacona. UltimatelyConsequently, though, the U.S. Congress rejected the treaty on grounds that it would drain money from Civil War expendituresMaximilian’s government rebuffed Confederate diplomatic overtures.Europeans Enter Mexico
With no other options, Juárez suspended payments on Mexican debt for two years. ====Civil War in 1857 destabilizes Mexico====In response1857, representatives from the Spanish, French, and British governments met Mexico became embroiled in London, and on October 31, 1861, signed a tripartite agreement to intervene in Mexico to recover civil war that pitted the unpaid debts. European forces landed at Veracruz on December 8of Liberal reformist Benito Juárez against Conservatives led by Félix Zuloaga. Juárez urged resistanceConservatives exerted control from Mexico City, while Conservatives saw the intervening forces as valuable allies in their struggle against and the Liberalsfrom Veracruz. Although The United States recognized the British Juárez government in 1859, and Spanish governments had more limited plans for intervention, Napoleon III was interested in reviving French global ambitionsJanuary of 1861, and French Liberal forces captured Mexico City, while Spanish greatly strengthening Juárez’s position and British forces withdrew after French plans became clearlegitimacy. In 1863, Napoleon III invited Maximilian, Archduke of AustriaHowever, continued instability had coincided with growing foreign debt that was increasingly difficult for the Mexican government to become Emperor of Mexicopay. Maximilian accepted the offer and arrived in Mexico in 1864. Although Maximilian’s Conservative government controlled much Secretary of the country, Liberals held on to power State Seward offered a plan that would provide mining concessions in northwestern Mexico and parts of the Pacific coastexchange for American loans.
In response the event that the debts were not repaid, Mexico would agree to these actions, Secretary the cession of State Seward issued statements Baja California and other Mexican states. The terms of disapprovalthe loan were onerous to the Mexican government, but the U.S. Government was unable to intervene directly because of the American Civil Wardiplomat Thomas Corwin successfully negotiated a treaty with Mexican representative Manuel Maria Zamacona. MoreoverUltimately, both Seward and though, the U.S. President Abraham Lincoln did not want to further antagonize Napoleon III, Congress rejected the treaty on grounds that it would drain money from Civil War expenditures. ====European forces invade Mexico and risk his intervention on install Maximilian the side Archduke of Austria as Emperor of the ConfederacyMexico====[[File:Maximilian_I_of_Mexico_portrait_standing. The U.S. Government also rejected overtures from jpg|thumbnail|left|250px|Emperor Maximilian of Mexico]]With no other Latin American countries options, Juárez suspended payments on Mexican debt for a pan-American solution to the conflicttwo years. HoweverIn response, representatives from the Mexican Minister to the United StatesSpanish, French, and British governments met in London, and on October 31, Matías Romero1861, worked carefully signed a tripartite agreement to build American support for intervene in Mexicoto recover the unpaid debts. Seward soon began to show increased support for Juárez’s governmentEuropean forces landed at Veracruz on December 8. Juárez urged resistance, while Conservatives saw the intervening forces as valuable allies in their struggle against the Liberals.
Napoleon’s Withdrawal from Although the British and Spanish governments had more limited plans for intervention, Napoleon III was interested in reviving French global ambitions, and French forces captured MexicoCity, while Spanish and British forces withdrew after French plans became clear. In 1863, Napoleon III invited Maximilian, Archduke of Austria, to become Emperor of Mexico. Maximilian accepted the offer and arrived in Mexico in 1864. Although Maximilian’s Conservative government controlled much of the country, Liberals held on to power in northwestern Mexico and parts of the Pacific coast.
The end of the American Civil War in 1865 coincided with the beginnings of success for Juárez’s forces against Maximilian’s. Maximilian, ill-informed on Mexican affairs prior to his arrival, alienated his Conservative allies by attempting In response to adopt more Liberal policiesthese actions, while he failed to win over Liberals, who saw him as a tool Secretary of State Seward issued statements of French interests and Mexican Conservatives. In 1865, Liberal military victories made Maximilian’s position increasingly difficult. Meanwhiledisapproval, but the U.S. Generals Ulysses S. Grant and Philip Henry Sheridan bypassed Seward and began covert support Government was unable to intervene directly because of Juárez along the Texas-Mexico borderAmerican Civil War. By then, the intervention in Mexico had grown unpopular with the French publicMoreover, both Seward and was an increasing drain on the French treasuryU.S. On January 31, 1866, President Abraham Lincoln did not want to further antagonize Napoleon III ordered the withdrawal of French troops, to be conducted in three stages from November 1866 to November 1867. Seward, who had earlier been more cautious, warned the Austrian Government against replacing French troops with its own forces, and risk his intervention on the threat side of war convinced the Austrian government to refrain from sending Maximilian reinforcementsConfederacy. Without European support, Maximilian was unable to retain power. His capture by Mexican forces, court-martial, and sentence to be executed, marked the end of direct European intervention in Mexico. Seward hoped that The U.S. support Government also rejected overtures from other Latin American countries for Juárez would improve relations with Mexico, but as part of Seward’s broader strategy of U.Sa pan-American solution to the conflict. expansionHowever, he hoped that the improved relations would eventually convince Mexico Mexican Minister to join the United States, Matías Romero, worked carefully to build American support for Mexico. Seward soon began to show increased support for Juárez’s government.
<div class="portal" style='float:right; width:35%'>
 
====Related Articles====
{{#dpl:category=United States History|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=7}}
</div>
====Mexico overthrows Maximilian====[[File:Edouard_Manet_022.jpg|thumbnail|left|250px|The Execution of Emperor Maximilian]]The end of the American Civil War in 1865 coincided with the beginnings of success for Juárez’s forces against Maximilian’s. Maximilian, ill-informed on Mexican affairs prior to his arrival, alienated his Conservative allies by attempting to adopt more Liberal policies, while he failed to win over Liberals, who saw him as a tool of French interests and Mexican Conservatives. In 1865, Liberal military victories made Maximilian’s position increasingly difficult. Meanwhile, U.S. NeutralityGenerals Ulysses S. Grant and Philip Henry Sheridan bypassed Seward and began covert support of Juárez along the Texas-Mexico border. By then, the intervention in Mexico had grown unpopular with the French public and was an increasing drain on the French treasury.  On January 31, 1866, Napoleon III ordered the withdrawal of French troops, to be conducted in three stages from November 1866 to November 1867. Seward, who had earlier been more cautious, warned the Austrian Government against replacing French troops with its own forces, and the threat of war convinced the Austrian government to refrain from sending Maximilian reinforcements. Without European support, Maximilian was unable to retain power. His capture by Mexican forces, court-martial, and sentenced to be executed, marked the end of direct European intervention in Mexico. Seward hoped that U.S. support for Juárez would improve relations with Mexico, but as part of Seward’s broader strategy of U.S. expansion, he hoped that the improved relations would eventually convince Mexico to join the United States. ====Conclusion====Throughout the period of French intervention, the overall U.S. policy was to avoid direct conflict with France, and voice displeasure at French interference in Mexican affairs, but ultimately to remain neutral in the conflict. After 1866, Seward provided more direct support for Juárez, while French willingness to withdraw de-escalated Franco-American tensions. Although U.S. support for Juárez improved U.S.-Mexican relations temporarily, disputes over policing of the border under Secretary of State William Evarts would erode the good will goodwill built during Seward’s tenure.
* Republished from [https://history.state.gov/| Office of the Historian, United States Department of State]

Navigation menu