Changes

Most of the movie's problems were because a result of studio meddling in the film's final cut. Ridley Scott was forced to cut his original version of the film to satisfy the studio executives' picture. He did this against his will, and these cuts gutted the movie. Later, Scott was allowed to release a director's cut of the movie on Blu-ray and DVD. The new cut included many scenes that Scott was forced to delete and is fifty minutes longer than the theatrical release. The director's cut was a dramatic improvement and was widely praised by the critics. It is now regarded as the definitive version of the movie. This article evaluates the director’s cut of <i>Kingdom of Heaven </i> and its historical accuracy instead of the dramatically inferior theatrical version.

====The historical background==What is the real story that <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> is based on? ==

The British director’s movie's background was followed the decline and fall of the First Kingdom of Jerusalem (1091-1087). The Crusaders established this kingdom after they had captured the city in 1081. They were The kingdom was created by Christian knights and soldiers who took a religious vow to recapture the Holy Land's sacred sites (modern Israel). The Kingdom of Jerusalem had been under near-constant attack from the Arabs and Muslims, for whom the city . Jerusalem is of great significant to three religious significance: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.<ref> Runciman, Steve. <i>A History of the Crusades, vol. II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem</i> (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1952), p 167</ref>

The movie captures the constant and brutal conflict between the Christians and the Muslims in the areaHoly Land. The Crusaders were motivated to fight in the Holy Land out of religious fervor. They genuinely believed that they could save their souls from eternal damnation by fighting the Muslims. The movie concentrates on the growing threat posed to the Kingdom of Jerusalem by the Ayyubid Sultanate's rise. This was a kingdom founded by Saladin, who deposed the last Fatimid Caliph in Egypt and later captured Syria. He was the most powerful Islamic ruler in the region in a century. The movie captures the threat posed by Saladin to the Crusaders because he was often regarded as a military genius.

Scott’s movie accurately depicts the lead up to the Battle of Hattin (1187). While the Battle of Hattin is one of the most significant battles in world history, it was a one-sided slaughter. Scott does not spend much time on the Hattin, and the movie's climax focuses on the Jerusalem's defense of Jerusalem. Scott's decision makes a lot of sense because Jerusalem's defense is a far more compelling story.<ref> Runciman, p 189</ref>

====The historicity How realistic is the portrayal of Balian of Ibelin in <i>Kingdom of the main characters==Heaven</i>? ==

Instead of using Bailin's birth father, the movie created a character, Godfrey of Ibelin, played by Liam Neeson. Neeson has played this type of role (the father-like mentor who dies in the movie) several times. In the movie, Neeson's character knights his son right before his death. By recognizing Bailian as his son, Bloom's character inherits his father's holding in the Holy Land. In reality, an illegitimate son's knighting would not have been legally possible in the Middle Ages without some dispensation from a monarch or the Catholic Church. Ridley Scott introduces Balian as living in France, but his origins are unknown, and his family may have been Italian.

The character is also shown as making his way to the Holy Land, and he did make this journey at some time. His father in the motion picture is shown to be a crusader, and this was indeed the case. The motion picture shows Godfrey of Ibelin as a noble knight who went on Crusade for religious reasons. Balian's father was one of the most powerful lords in the Crusader States. He ruled the County of Jaffa (modern Israel). He was a vassal of the King of Jerusalem .<ref> William of Tyre, p 201</ref> In the movie, we see Balian going on crusade with his father, who died before arriving in the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Balian had likely been living in the Crusader kingdom since he was a young man. He was not the only son of Barisan of Ibelin and was, in reality, his youngest son. His father gave Balian a large land area and a castle, and he too became a vassal of the King of Jerusalem. <ref>William of Tyre, p 212</ref> He would have been very familiar with the region's culture and politics. Scott's depiction makes sense from a storytelling perspective. Most viewers would have been unfamiliar with the Crusader Nation. Balian provides a window into this world for the audience. While it is inaccurate from a historical perspective, Scott can introduce this bizarre world to a modern audience.

Balian is portrayed as had likely been living in the Crusader kingdom since he was a young man in . He was not the Kingdom only son of Barisan of HeavenIbelin and was, in reality, but the real his youngest son. His father gave Balian was already a mature man by this time period. The movie does correctly show that in the 1180slarge land area and a castle, Balian was and he too became a major figure in vassal of the Kingdom King of Jerusalem. <ref>William of Tyre, p 212</ref> He would have been very familiar with the region's culture and politics. He was very involved in Scott's depiction makes sense from a storytelling perspective. Most viewers would have been unfamiliar with the power struggles that greatly weakened Crusader Nation. Balian provides a window into this world for the realmaudience. In the movie, the hero struggles to save the Kingdom While it is inaccurate from various factions who were only interested in power. In realitya historical perspective, Balian was quite Machiavellian and sought Scott can introduce this bizarre world to increase his own power and influence at his rivals' expense. However, the movie accurately shows that Bloom's character was a great and brave knightmodern audience.

To Balian is portrayed as a young man in the Kingdom of Heaven, but the real Balian was already a mature man by this time period. The movie does correctly show that in the 1180s, Balian was a major figure in the Kingdom of Jerusalem's politics. He was very involved in the power struggles that greatly weakened the realm. In the movie, the hero struggles to save the Kingdom from various factions interested in power. In reality, Balian was quite Machiavellian and sought to increase his own power and influence at his rivals' expense. However, the movie accurately shows that Bloom's character was a great and brave knight.  The movie's credit, it does a good job accurately portraying Jerusalem's defense by Balian and his forces. Balian was shown as an outstanding swordsman, a brave leader, and an outstanding tactician in the movie. Bloom's character became the commander of the Christian garrison of Jerusalem before the Battle of Hattin. He devised the defense of Jerusalem that effectively beat off countless attacks by the Muslims. Balian was the commander, but the movie diminishes the importance of other leaders who were also pivotal in Jerusalem's defense. Balian is essentially a composite character for this battle.

Balian and Saladin reaching reached a negotiated settlement that ended the bloody siege. This was actually the case, and the is accurate. The Christians did agree to surrender the city on terms in 1187. In one of the most memorable scenes, we see the main character leading the Christians safely out of Jerusalem as he hands it over to Saladin. This actually happened, and the Muslims did allow the garrison and the Christian population to leave the city unmolested. After the Jerusalem's surrender of Jerusalem to the Muslim Sultan, he returns to Europe with Sybilla in the movie. He is shown as living happily as a blacksmith in his native village and refusing English knights' entreaties to go on the Third Crusade in one scene. In fact, after  After the fall of Jerusalem, Balian stayed in the region and became one of the Crusader states' leaders. He actually participated in the Third Crusades and was a key advisor to the legendary Richard the Lionheart. Scott shows the main character as having good relations with Muslims, and indeed, in real-life, Balian of Ibelin had a good relationship with Saladin.

==== Who was Sibylla of Jerusalem==? ==In <i>Kingdom of Heaven</I>, Balian has a passionate affair with Sibylla of Jerusalem. She was a real-life character and a sister of King of Jerusalem and later became Queen of the Kingdom after she married Guy Lusignan.<ref>Bernard Hamilton, "Women in the Crusader States: The Queens of Jerusalem," in Medieval Women, edited by Derek Baker. (London, Ecclesiastical History Society, 1978), p 17</ref> She was a potent woman and had an extraordinary amount of influence among the Crusaders. I

==== Did <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> accurately depict Guy de Lusignan==? ==

One of the key characters in the Kingdom of Heaven is Guy de Lusignan. He was a real-life historical character and critical in the fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. He is the villain in <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i>, essentially correct. He had been expelled from France for murder, and he had fled to the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Guy later married Sibylla and became King of Jerusalem after the death of Sibylla's brother. He is shown as a radical anti-Muslim in the motion picture and is closely aligned with the Knights Templars.<ref> Runciman, p 212</ref> In the movie, Guy repeatedly made horrible decisions. Each of the decisions was driven by his hatred of Muslims and his desire to expel them from the Holy Land. Essentially, his choices led to the Battle of Hattin, the slaughter of the Jerusalem's army of Jerusalem, and the Crusaders' expulsion from Jerusalem.

In one of the movie's key scenes, Guy and his allies are shown attacking attack a Muslim caravan. They then kill every man, woman, and child in the caravan to violate their agreement with Saladin. This attack forced Saladin to invade the Kingdom of Jerusalem, which was a disaster for the Crusaders. This attack occurred, and Guy’s massacre of innocent Muslims provoked Saladin. This incident precipitated the capture of Jerusalem by the Muslims.<ref>Runciman, p 213</ref>

Moreover, after the fall of Jerusalem, Guy still had a claim on the kingship of the Crusader states ' kingship through his wife, Sybilla. He remained in the former Kingdom of Jerusalem and began a civil war in a desperate bid to become king but was defeated. Ultimately, he was forced to flee from the Holy Land. Despite his repeated failures, he was able, after he fled, to seize control of the island of Cyprus and become its lord. He even established a dynasty, and his successors ruled the islands as kings until the coming of the Ottomans took control in 1476.<ref> Edbury, Peter. The Kingdom of Cyprus and the Crusades, 1191–1374 (Cambridge, 1991), p 22 </ref>

====Conclusion==Is the <i>Kingdom of Heaven<i> realistic? ==Despite its rocky start, <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> after the Director’s Cut release has been hailed by critics and has been discovered by audiences. Remarkably, the movie does a good job balancing historical accuracy and telling a story. The historical background and major events such as the Battle of Hattin are portrayed fairly. It does a good explaining the decline and fall of the First Kingdom of Jerusalem. The nature of warfare at the time is shown very well. Moreover, it does present a realistic portrait of Saladin. In essence, this the type of historical accuracy most movies should strive for.

The Kingdom of Heaven does take substantial liberties with the historical figures involved in the Fall of Jerusalem, but these choices made a lot of sensefor a movie. Balian, Sibylla, and Neeson's character were either heavily fictionalized or created specifically for the movie, but each of them is critical to tell the story. Balian, in addition to being the hero, serves as a guide for the viewer. Through his eyes, the viewers are introduced to the Crusades, learn about the history of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, and are shown the divisions with the Kingdom that lead to its destruction. Sibylla also helps the viewer to see the decaying Kingdom and humanizes the King of Jerusalem, played by Edward Norton.