15,697
edits
Changes
no edit summary
<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTqmIFEx72E</youtube>
__NOTOC__
[[File: Third Century AD one.jpg |200px|thumb|left| Bust of Emperor Alexander Severus]]
The Third Century Crisis in the 2nd century AD was a series of military, social, and political crises that almost destroyed the Roman Empire. For some fifty years (235-285 AD), one of the world’s greatest Empire’s and one of the most influential state’s in history was stricken by military revolts, barbarian invasions, economic collapse, plague, and political divisions. For many years it seemed that the Roman Empire would fragment and collapse.
However, a series of military Emperors managed to save the state and allowed it to continue to exist in the west for almost two hundred years and in the east for another thousand years. The origins of the Third Century Crisis is complex. It will be argued that the crisis was a result of, a breakdown in army discipline, barbarian invasions, the rise of the Sassanian Empire, and natural disasters.
====The Background====
In 200 AD, the Roman Empire was at its greatest extent since the Trajan's reign of Trajan , and a strong Emperor, Septimius Severus , governed it. The Empire seemed invincible, and it had overawed the German and Iranian tribes on its Rhine and Danuban frontiers.<ref>Hekster, Oliver. Rome and its Empire, AD 193–284 (Edinburgh 2008), p 119</ref> The Parthian Empire, once Rome’s most formidable enemy in the east , was no longer a serious threat. The local elites in the Empire had become Romanized and were very loyal to Rome. However, beneath the surface, the state had been undermined by a series of problems. Inflation, as a result of the debasing of the currency, was causing persistent economic issues.<ref>Heckster, p 127</ref> Moreover, the plague that had ravaged Rome and its provinces in the 160s had led to a dramatic drop in the population, and this was to have long-term consequences for the Imperial territories. After the death of Emperor Severus, his sons Geta and Caracalla ruled as co-Emperors. Caracalla murdered his brother and became sole ruler and according to Gibbon he ‘was the common enemy of mankind.’<ref>Gibbon, Edward, <i>Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire</i>, chapter 6</ref> After Caracalla was assassinated, in 217 AD, he was succeeded by an alleged relative Elagabalus, a former priest in a sun-cult in Syria. The sources are all hostile to Elagabalus, who tried to impose his religion on Rome and be transgender.<ref>Gibbon, I, Chp 6</ref> When he was assassinated (222 AD), he was succeeded by his nephew Alexander Severus, who was a benign ruler who was prepared to cooperate with the Senate. However, he too was assassinated, and his death is widely seen as the start of the Third Century Crisis.<ref>Hekster, p 198</ref>
[[File: 3rd century AD 2.jpg |200px|thumb|left| Emperor Decius who was defeated and killed by the Goths]]
Furthermore, parts of Dacia and the Rhine provinces were occupied by German tribes. No part of the Empire was safe from raiders , and Gothic pirates besieged even Athens was besieged by Gothic pirates. During the many wars and invasions, pan-Mediterranean trade was severely curtailed. Hyper-inflation became the norm. Agriculture was disrupted, and food shortages were common and another eruption of the plague devasted many urban centers. However, the Empire managed to pull itself back from the abyss under a series of military Emperors. The Roman army remained very formidable , and under several Illyrian Emperors, the order was restored in the provinces, and the frontiers secured.
The recovery began when Claudius II defeated a Gothic invasion and after . After he died of the plague , he was succeeded by his Master of Cavalry, Aurelian in 275 AD. He was a brilliant commander and he defeated several barbarian invasions. He then went on to defeat the Gallic and Palmyrene Empire. However, instability continued after his assassination , and it was only with the Diocletian's accession of Diocletian, that the crisis was finally ended. However, it is widely held that the Third Century Crisis permanently weakened the Empire and it . It ushered in trends that many see as marking the beginning of the end of the world of Antiquity and marking the transition to the Medieval world.<ref> Brown, P, The World of Late Antiquity (W Norton, London, 1971), p. 22 </ref>
====Which Barbarian Invasions==weakened Rome? ==In the reign of Alexander Severus, there was a sudden rise in the number of raids by German and other barbarians. These raids were a part of life for Rome’s frontier population , but by the 230s, they became more intense and frequent.<ref> Southern, Pat. The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine (London, Routledge, 2015), p 356</ref> German tribes became better organized and formed into confederations such as the Franks.
<dh-ad/>
The emergence of the Goths, who created a large state in modern Ukraine, created a significant challenge for the Balkan and Black Sea provinces. They were militarily powerful and were especially proficient in cavalry and even took to the sea to launch piratical attacks in the 250 AD. The barbarian attacks were ferocious for two reasons. First, the Romans had been weakened by constant warfare. The bloody civil wars had been especially devasting. The Roman legions could no longer defeat foreign raids and invasions.<ref>Heckster, p 113</ref>
Second, the barbarians were often desperate. Climate change and rising sea levels had impacted on their food supply , and they were forced to raid deeper and deeper into Imperial Roman territories. They needed to secure resources and seize arable lands to stay alive. The continuous barbarian invasion thus weakened the Empire, and this encouraged further raiding by tribal confederations beyond the Rhine and Danube.
====The How did the Rise of Sassanian Persia==threaten Rome? ==
[[File: 3rd century crisis.jpg |200px|thumb|left|The ruins of Palmyra in present-day Syria 2010]]
In 224 AD, Ardashir, the ruler of Fars in modern Iran, defeated and killed the last of the Parthian kings and this is seen as the beginning of the Sassanian Empire. Its Emperors or ‘King of Kings’ portrayed themselves as the heirs of the Great Persian Empire of Xerxes.<ref> Heckster, p 139</ref> It was a much more formidable state that the Parthian and within two decades, the Sassanians ruled an area much larger than anything governed by their predecessors. The neo-Persian Empire was a centralized state and had a regular army.
As soon as the Sassanians took power, they began raiding Roman Syria and Asia Minor under the capable and ruthless Shapur I. The emergence of a new force in the east was a grave challenge for the legions. The constant battles with the Germans in Europe and Persians in the Near East had overstretched the Roman Army. In consequence, the legions could not defend the frontiers. This, in turn, led to the rise of local warlords and ultimately the rise of the Palmyrene Empire, which for a time ruled almost all of the near Near East and even Egypt. The foundation of the Sassanian Empire, under Under a series of able rulers, the foundation of the Sassanian Empire was one of the most significant factors in the Third Century Crisis. == What role did pandemics and climate change in the 3rd Century Crisis? ==The inability of the Romans to defend their borders was related to socio-economic factors. A pandemic had decimated the Imperial territories in the 250s and 260s, leading to population decline. The plague, according to Gibbon, ‘five thousand persons died daily in Rome, and many towns that had escaped the hands of the barbarians were entirely depopulated.’<ref>Gibbon, I, chapter 8</ref> This had serious repercussions as the army found it harder to recruit legionnaires. The tax base was much reduced, which led to serious economic dislocation.
====The Military Anarchy==Why did the Roman Army fall apart during the Third Century? ==The Third Century Crisis is sometimes known as the ‘Military Anarchy.’<ref>Scarre, Chris, Chronicle of the Roman Emperors: the reign-by-reign record of the rulers of Imperial Rome, (London, Thames & Hudson, 1995), p 198</ref> In other words, the army was not controlled by any unified authority. The different legions sought to have their general become Emperor, because of the prestige and the monetary rewards that they would secure upon his their accession. As a result, the legions in the Balkans would fight those from the Western provinces in order to determine who should become the ruler of the Roman World.
The root cause of the civil wars and endless usurpations was the fact that Rome had not developed a formal succession process even though it was a de-facto monarchy. As a result, any general with an army could intimidate the Senate to recognize his right to become the legitimate Emperor. This led to a profoundly unstable system , and for almost fifty years , there was rarely a strong government. Because as Gibbon noted ‘the soldiery had become aware of their power’, they disregarded any authority that was not aligned with their interests.<ref> Gibbon, I, Chp. 7</ref> The result was endless civil wars that depleted the legions' ranks of the legions and meant that they could not defend the Imperial provinces. It was only when the army was brought under the Diocletian's control of Diocletian and his reformed administration that the civil wars ended, and the legions could once again protect the Empire.
====Further Readings====