Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

The Federalist Papers - Number 9

187 bytes added, 17:23, 19 May 2019
no edit summary
The utility of a Confederacy, as well to suppress faction and to guard the internal tranquillity of States, as to increase their external force and security, is in reality not a new idea. It has been practiced upon in different countries and ages, and has received the sanction of the most approved writers on the subject of politics. The opponents of the plan proposed have, with great assiduity, cited and circulated the observations of Montesquieu on the necessity of a contracted territory for a republican government. But they seem not to have been apprised of the sentiments of that great man expressed in another part of his work, nor to have adverted to the consequences of the principle to which they subscribe with such ready acquiescence.
<div class="portal" style='float:right; width:35%'>====Related Articles===={{#dpl:category=Colonial American History|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=7}}</div>
When Montesquieu recommends a small extent for republics, the standards he had in view were of dimensions far short of the limits of almost every one of these States. Neither Virginia, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, nor Georgia can by any means be compared with the models from which he reasoned and to which the terms of his description apply. If we therefore take his ideas on this point as the criterion of truth, we shall be driven to the alternative either of taking refuge at once in the arms of monarchy, or of splitting ourselves into an infinity of little, jealous, clashing, tumultuous commonwealths, the wretched nurseries of unceasing discord, and the miserable objects of universal pity or contempt. Some of the writers who have come forward on the other side of the question seem to have been aware of the dilemma; and have even been bold enough to hint at the division of the larger States as a desirable thing. Such an infatuated policy, such a desperate expedient, might, by the multiplication of petty offices, answer the views of men who possess not qualifications to extend their influence beyond the narrow circles of personal intrigue, but it could never promote the greatness or happiness of the people of America.
PUBLIUS.
<references/>
* The Federalist No. 9 from [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/default.asp| The Avalon Project]
[[Category: US History Documents]] [[Category: Historical Documents]] [[Category: Federalist Papers]]
 
* The Federalist No. 9 from [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/default.asp| The Avalon Project]

Navigation menu