Changes

__NOTOC__[[File:Europe c. 1700.png|thumbnail|350px|left|Figure 1. Europe at the time of the War of the Spanish Succession.]]The War of the Spanish Succession was a devastating war that occurred from 1702-1715. It embroiled all of the Europe's major powers of Europe, including Britain, France, Austria, Spain, Prussia and other German kingdoms, Italian kingdoms, Portugal, and the Netherlands. The main result of the war is that it prevented France from unifying itself with Spain, after the death of Charles II from the Habsburg dynasty. However, more than resolving this possible unification, it created a new order of power that had global consequences.

====War and its Outcomes====The war was initially sparked by the death of Charles II, the last Habsburg monarch on the throne of Spain (Figure 1). Charles II had promised the throne to Philip, Duke of Anjou, who was the grandson of Louis XIV. With the death of Charles and Philip being proclaimed king in Spain, Louis XIV embarked on taking the rest of the Spanish territories, in particular particularly in Spanish Netherlands. This was seen as an attempt by Louis to unify much of Western Europe under his control and solidifying France's dominance in Europe. This triggered an alliance between the Dutch, England, Prussia, Hanover, other German states, and Portugal. On the other side, France's Louis was allied with Bavaria, Cologne, and the dukes of Mantua , and Savoy's dukes. However, although Savoy later switched sides.<ref>For more on the background leading up to the war, see: Falkner, J. (2015) <i>The War of the Spanish succession 1701-1714.</i> Barnsley, South Yorkshire, Pen & Sword Military.

England was ably led in on the battlefield by the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy. Due to a falling out, Prince Eugene had switched his alliance from France to the England's one led by England. With perhaps Europe's two most able generals, under Marlborough and Prince Eugene, decisive victories were achieved that reversed French gains, where they . They were forced to retreat from Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy. The British, in In particular, by now the British relied less on its monarchy , and parliament played a more active role in the war. By 1708, France was ready to make terms. Nevertheless, British demands proved onerous, as Britain wanted Louis to send his own army to depose his own grandson from his throne in Spain. This led to the war to drag on. However, by 1711, things had changed, as the Duke of Marlborough fell out with his English backers and the rise of Archduke Charles, from the Habsburg's in Austria, changed the situation, where his rise threatened to bring Spain back under him. In effect, it diminished the appetite in Europe for continuing the war. Additionally, the alliance against France found difficulty fighting in Spain itself, where the territory and fighting proved more difficult. This led to an eventual series of treaties that ended the war, starting in 1713 (Treaty of Utrecht) and then later the treaties of Rastatt and Baden.<ref>For more on the alliances and war leaders in the war, in particular Marlborough's role, see: Dorrell, N. (2015) <i>Marlborough’s other army: the British Army and the campaigns of the First Peninsula War, 1702-1712.</i> Century of the soldier 2. Solihull, Helion. </ref>

The treaties effectively kept Spain under Louis' grandsonHowever, by 1711, things had changed, where now as the House Duke of Bourbon ruled, although it also meant it could not unite Marlborough fell out with Spain. Furthermore, France his English backers and Spain were forced to give up a series the rise of territories, including Spanish Netherlands and Naples Archduke Charles from the Habsburg's in Europe. Other smaller territories such as Gibraltar were lost. In Austria changed the New Worldsituation, Newfoundland was given where his rise threatened to the British forcesbring Spain back under him. EffectivelyIn effect, it diminished the appetite in Europe for continuing the war. Additionally, according to the parties that accepted the treaties, kept the balance of power alliance against France found difficulty fighting in EuropeSpain itself, where France the territory and Spain retained their desire for a Bourbon king, but fighting proved more difficult. This led to an eventual series of treaties that power was not as strong as desired initially by Louis, as it had to give up territories. The ended the war could have been more of a disaster for France, but by 1711-13 they were starting in a better position to negotiate1713 (Treaty of Utrecht) and then later the treaties of Rastatt and Baden.<ref>For more on the treaties related to alliances and war leaders in the war, in particular Marlborough's role, see: Linda Frey & Marsha Frey (edsDorrell, N.) (19952015) <i>The treaties Marlborough’s other army: the British Army and the campaigns of the First Peninsula War of the Spanish Succession: an historical and critical dictionary, 1702-1712.</i> Westport, ConnCentury of the soldier 2. Solihull, Greenwood PressHelion.</ref>

[[File:The treaties effectively kept Spain under Louis' grandson, where now the House of Bourbon ruled, although it also meant it could not unite with Spain. Furthermore, France and Spain were forced to give up territories, including the Spanish Netherlands and Naples in Europe c. 1700Other smaller territories such as Gibraltar were lost.png|thumbnail|Figure 1In the New World, Newfoundland was given to the British forces. Effectively, the war, according to the parties that accepted the treaties, kept the balance of power in Europe at , where France and Spain retained their desire for a Bourbon king. Still, that power was not as strong as Louis initially desired, as it had to give up territories. The war could have been more of a disaster for France. Still, by 1711-13 they were in a better position to negotiate.<ref>For more on the time treaties related to the war, see: Linda Frey & Marsha Frey (eds.) (1995) <i>The treaties of the War of the Spanish Succession: a historical and critical dictionary.</i> Westport, Conn, Greenwood Press.]]</ref>

====Long-Term Impact====[[File:Fort-william-the-headquarters-of-the-british-east-india-company-in-kolkata-india.jpg|left|thumbnail|Figure 2. The headquarters of the British East India Company in Fort William. The company benefited from gaining British dominance in places such as India soon after the war.]]While, in principle, the war maintained a balance in European politics among the powers, the reality was different. First, the new United Kingdom that had formally united Scotland with England had emerged as a global power, in strong part, thanks to the war and its aftermath. Britain gained several key territories, particularly in the New World, such as Newfoundland, and access to trade and areas where the French had once dominated. Additionally, they controlled Gibraltar, taking it from Spain (and still have to this day).

While in principal, the war maintained a balance in European politics among the powers, the reality was different. First, the new United Kingdom that had formally united Scotland with England had emerged as a global power, in strong part thanks to the war and its aftermath. Britain gained a number of key territories, particularly in the New World such as Newfoundland and access to trade along areas where the French had once dominated. Additionally, they controlled Gibraltar, taking it from Spain (and which they still have to this day). However, rather than mainly weakening their main enemy, France, the war significantly weakened the Dutch, where they were straddled by large debtsstraddled them. This now allowed Britain to take over many trade opportunities, in Africa, North America, and in particular in India and the east, that the Dutch once controlled. The Britain's rise of Britain as a commercial and territorial empire had essentially accelerated due to the war's consequences. In fact, the rise of the British India East Company, for instance, greatly hastened after this time, particularly as the Dutch East India Company's fortunes began to wane soon after the war (Figure 2).<ref>For more on the long-term impact on Britain, see: Hattendorf, J.B. (1987) <i>England in the War of the Spanish Succession: a study of the English view and conduct of grand strategy, 1702-1712.</i> Modern European history. New York, Garland Pub.</ref>

For the Dutch, the war dragged for a long time , and the population of three million could not cope with a large debt. In essence, the Dutch had been very influential in European affairs in the 17th century. Still, but after this war , that influence had declined sharply as their maritime empire , and trading prowess declined due to the war's debts and cost of the war to them. In effect, despite being on the side that gained the most from the war's ending, the Dutch saw significant losses in their overall influence and economic prowess.<ref>For more on the war's effect on Holland, see: Satsuma, S. (2013) <i>Britain and colonial maritime war in the early eighteenth century: silver, seapower , and the Atlantic.</i> Woodbridge, Suffolk ; Rochester, NY, The Boydell Press.</ref>

For France, the war seemed to go disastrous in the first few years, but by the end of the war they were in a stronger position and despite losses in North America, they did not lose the bulk of their colonies. What may have weakened France was more to do with the monarchy in France having become too centralized and strong. Additionally, the costs of the war had a long-term consequence, as France after this war began to find it more difficult to pay for its conflicts, incurring more debt. This created greater distance between the French government and French people, where over time this distance proved devastating and helped lead to the French Revolution. In fact, the later Seven Year War and American Revolution likely contributed more to the decline of France's royal family. The flexibility of the parliamentary system, however, which did not depend on a strong ruler, such as the system in Britain, may, however, had an effect and influence through demonstrating its effectiveness in conducting campaigns by changing leadership and not being prone to impulsive monarchs.<ref>For more on France in the 18th century, see: Dhondt, F. (2015) <i>Balance of power and norm hierarchy: Francodh-British diplomacy after the Peace of Utrecht.</i> Legal history library volume 17. Leiden, The Netherlands ; Boston, Brill Nijhoff.<ad/ref>

For SpainFrance, the war brought seemed to go disastrous in the first few years, but by the end of the war, they were in a large territorial loss stronger position, and despite losses in EuropeNorth America, although its overseas empire remained intactthey did not lose the bulk of their colonies. Never again did Spain arise What may have weakened France was more to be as influential as it was in the 16th do with France's monarchy had become too centralized and 17th centuries in European affairsstrong. The main effect was the new ruling houseAdditionally, the Bourbonswar's costs had a long-term consequence, brought new ideas in government and administration that had developed in like France, allowing Spain after this war, began to find it more rapidly modernize difficult to pay for its political infrastructure in conflicts, incurring more debt. This created greater distance between the French government and the French people, where over time, this distance proved devastating and helped lead to the 18th centuryFrench Revolution. This briefly restored Spanish powerIn fact, although it never gained the dominance it held prior later Seven Year War and American Revolution likely contributed more to the war in European affairsdecline of France's royal family. Spain also became more centralizedThe flexibility of the parliamentary system, however, which did not depend on a strong ruler, where King Philip united such as the crowns of Aragon system in Britain, may have an effect and influence through demonstrating its effectiveness in conducting campaigns by changing leadership and Castilenot being prone to impulsive monarchs.<ref>For more on Spain after France in the war18th century, see: RobertsDhondt, J.MF. (19972015) <i>The Penguin history Balance of power and norm hierarchy: Franco-British diplomacy after the Peace of EuropeUtrecht.</i> LondonLegal history library volume 17. Leiden, England The Netherlands ; New YorkBoston, N.Y., USA, Penguin Books, pg. 17Brill Nijhoff. </ref>

[[File:Fort-william-For Spain, the-headquarters-of-the-british-east-india-company-war brought a large territorial loss in-kolkata-indiaEurope, although its overseas empire remained intact.jpg|thumbnail|Figure 2Never again did Spain arise to be as influential as it was in European affairs in the 16th and 17th centuries. The headquarters of main effect was the new ruling house, the British East India Company Bourbons, brought new ideas in government and administration that had developed in France, allowing Spain to more rapidly modernizing its political infrastructure in Fort Williamthe 18th century. The compnay benefited from gaining British This briefly restored Spanish power, although it never gained its dominance before the war in places such as India soon European affairs. Spain also became more centralized, where King Philip united the crowns of Aragon and Castile.<ref>For more on Spain after the war, see: Roberts, J.M. (1997) <i>The Penguin history of Europe.</i> London, England ; New York, N.Y., USA, Penguin Books, pg. 17.]]</ref>

====Effects on States Today====The effects of the war are evident today. In Gibraltar, Spain wants the territory back, where it is still a British overseas territory. The rise of Britain after the war also enabled it to become the largest empire in history. In particular, Britain was better able to focus on the East after this war, as the East India Company arose as a commercial and later territorial power. In effect, by dominating sea trade, after the Dutch's collapse, Britain had a way to finance its overseas empire. This meant that no major global conflict did not involve Britain to some level after this war, as the British Empire now became the dominant trade and territorial empire across much of the globe. Today, this has meant many countries have effectively taken up the legacies of British imperial rule. In India, for instance, legacies on education, government, and language are evident. This is also true in other countries that Britain was able to expand into as its overseas power increased, including in Africa and Asia.<ref>For more on the legacy of Britain, connecting back to the War of the Spanish Succession, see: Satsuma, S. (2013) <i>Britain and colonial maritime war in the early eighteenth century: silver, seapower and the Atlantic.</i> Woodbridge, Suffolk ; Rochester, NY, The Boydell Press.</ref>

The effects of the war are evident today. In Gibraltar, Spain continues helped to lead to want the territory backdownfall of France's monarchy, where as it is today still a British overseas territoryincreasingly became isolated from its population and more centralized. The rise of Britain after the war High financial costs also enabled led to debt that made it difficult for France to become the largest empire in historyrecover from. In particularFrance and elsewhere in Western Europe, Britain was better able to focus on particularly as the East after this warFrench Revolution became influential, as the East India Company arose gradual move toward parliamentary systems began to hasten, as a commercial and later territorial powerdevastating wars showed monarchical-led states' weakness. In effect, by dominating sea trade, after the collapse of the Dutch, Britain had a way road to finance its overseas empire. This meant that after this war no major global conflict did not involve Britain Western Europe's democracies hastened due to some level, as the British Empire now became the dominant trade costliness and territorial empire across much of the globe. Today, this has meant many countries have effectively taken up the legacies of British imperial rule. In India, for instance, legacies on education, government, and language are evident. This is also true in other countries that Britain was able to expand into changes brought about by wars such as its overseas power increased, including in Africa and Asia.<ref>For more on the legacy of Britain, connecting back to the War of the Spanish Succession, see: Satsuma, S. (2013) <i>Britain and colonial maritime war in the early eighteenth century: silver, seapower and the Atlantic.</i> Woodbridge, Suffolk ; Rochester, NY, The Boydell PressWar.</ref>

The war helped to lead to the downfall of France's monarchy, as it increasingly became isolated from its population and more centralized. High financial costs also led to debt that made it difficult for France to recover from. In France, and elsewhere in Western Europe, particularly as the French Revolution became influential, the gradual move toward parliamentary systems began to hasten, as devastating wars showed the weakness of monarchical-led states. In effectFurthermore, the road to Western Europe's democracies hastened due to the costliness and changes brought about from wars such as the War of the Spanish Succession. Furthermore, the War of the Spanish Succession showed that devastating wars could be created by simply having a monarch die without heirs. Creating systems that can withstand changes to any individual family or households household proved to be more attractive as the European Enlightenment continued. The states we see today in Western Europe reflect the evolutionary changes that were shaped by the war, as its financial and human costs began to lead to different forms of states that governed with less dependence on monarchs.<ref>For more on the rise of Western Europe's democracies, and the long road, see: Waltraud Schelkle, Georg Elwert, & Martin Kohli (eds.) (2000) <i>Paradigms of social change: modernization, development, transformation, evolution.</i> Frankfurt/Main, Campus-Verl. [u.a.], pg. 106.</ref>

====Summary====At first, the War of the Spanish Succession War appeared to be similar to other wars that dominated Europe in the late 17th century. However, the long-term nature of the conflict and lack of clear resolution for many years led to it being costly for some countries, in particular particularly the Dutch and Spain, while others greatly benefited, such as Britain. This helped to shape global affairs that developed in the next few centuries, as Britain came to dominate global trade and world affairs. In the long-term, however, it was the failure of European monarchies failed to easily resolve an issue such as succession without launching major wars that helped to weaken the influence of monarchies throughout Europe. This process had started in Britain earlier, during the English Civil War, but the War of the Spanish Succession and later Seven Years War helped to hasten the demise of the French monarchy's demise. Ultimately, the The rise of parliaments or representative democracies happened slowly the French Republic would be another critical step in Europeto removing the influence of monarchies, but the Wars War of the Spanish Succession were a key step shaped this process in that process many ways. Some of Western Europe's last remaining territorial conflicts, such as they created the conditions for monarchies to loose their absolute appealdebate regarding Gibraltar, is also a legacy from this war.

<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoyeET_F6i0</youtube> <div class="portal" style="width:85%;">====Related DailyHistory.org Articles====*[[Why Did American Colonists Become United Against England?]]*[[Why did the Congress of Vienna fail to stop future European wars?]]*[[What did Prussia’s victory in the Franco-Prussian War mean for Europe?]]*[[Why did the Italian Renaissance End?]]*[[American Revolution Top Ten Booklist]]</div>====References====<references/> [[Category:Wikis]][[Category:Spanish History]][[Category:Military History]][[Category:18th Century History]][[Category:British History]] Updated December 3, 2020