Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

The Other Founders by Saul Cornell - Book Review

455 bytes added, 20:48, 4 December 2018
no edit summary
[[File:The_Other_Founders.jpg|thumnail|left|275px|[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0807847860/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0807847860&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=c4a0f86bbb318d99e401678ab554a4ff The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism & the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788 – 1828] by Saul Cornell]]
Saul Cornell[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0807847860/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0807847860&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=c4a0f86bbb318d99e401678ab554a4ff The Other Founders] published by the University of North Carolina The Other Founders Press focuses on the most prominent opponents of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists or the Other Founders while ultimately unsuccessful in opposing the ratification of the Constitution but played prominent roles in both shaping the Bill of Rights and the interpreting the Constitution. Cornell explains who the Other Founders were, what united them in their quest against the ratification of the Constitution and the role they played in interpreting it after ratification.
The Anti-Federalists were comprised of essentially three groups of Americans: westerners, middling businessman and southern farmers. While the Anti-Federalists were composed of radically different groups, they made fairly nine fairly consistent arguments against the Constitution’s ratification.
* They were concerned that the Constitution abolished the Federal character of the United States in favor of the centralized government.
* The Constitution would undermine the republican character of the Union in favor the creation of an aristocracy.
* Individuals were not adequately represented in the House of Representatives and the Constitution dangerous blended the executive and legislative branches.

Navigation menu