15,697
edits
Changes
no edit summary
=== 1920s Onward ===
[[File:Carrie_Buck.jpg|thumbnail|left|300px350px|Carrie and Emma Buck]]
Mass sterilization did not begin in earnest until the 1920s. California, for example had already sterilized some 2500 people before 1921, and had nearly doubled that number by 1928.<ref>https://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/CA/CA.html.</ref> Elsewhere, other States’ eugenic sterilization numbers rose as well--bolstered, in part, but the U.S. Supreme Court Decision <i>Buck v. Bell</i> (1927).
In 1924, Virginia created a new sterilization law for their State in order to reduce the burden on taxpayers for the cost of institutionalization. Carrie Buck became the first person sterilized under Virginia’s new law. She was 17 and had a child out of wedlock. The child was the product of a rape, but nevertheless was seen as evidence of Carrie’s moral degeneracy. Furthermore, Carrie’s mother was already a patient at the Virginia Colony for the Epileptic and Feebleminded—which also seemed to serve as evidence of bad lineage. Carrie’s defense challenged the validity of the law, and the case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court where Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld the constitutionality of Virginia’s sterilization law and uttered the infamous lines: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Carrie’s sterilization, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling set a precedent that allowed for thousands of Americans to be sterilized under individual states’ legislation. The number sterilizations began to wane after World War II because of the negative publicity generated by the Nazi Germany's eugenic policy. Nevertheless, by the 1960s, some 60,000 Americans were sterilized. Approximately one third of those sterilizations were performed in California alone.
=== After WWII ===
Sterilizations were performed unevenly across the American population, and eugenicists typically targeted poor women and/or women of color. In the 1960s, in particular, welfare recipients became the target of sterilization. Despite legal challenges, sterilization continued through the 1970s.<ref><i>Skinner v. Oklahoma</i>, Reif v. Weinberger, for example.</ref> One of the most obvious cases that brought attention to the issue of 50 years of compulsory sterilization was <i>Madrigal v. Quilligan </i> (1978). In this class action suit, ethnic Mexican women sued obstetricians at Los Angeles County General Hospital for non-consensual sterilization. The plaintiffs were working-class Mexican origin women. In most of the cases, the women were coerced into agreeing to a tubal ligation while delivering children via caesarian section. Some women did not know what they were signing because the documents were in English and the patient spoke Spanish. In other instances the euphemism of having tubes "tied" suggested that they could be "untied," so women consented not recognizing the permanence, and in the worst instances, women were denied medical attention until forms had been signed. Ultimately, the court cited with the hospital, but as a result, more attention was brought to the fact that many states still had compulsory sterilization laws on the books--even if they were not necessarily being practiced anymore. Additionally, waiting periods and multilingual forms have also emerged in an attempt to correct the wrong that had been done to these women.<div class="portal" style="width:85%;"> ==Related DailyHistory.org Articles==*[[How Did Hospitals Emerge?]]*[[How did illegal abortions spur the push for medical licensing in the 19th Century?]]*[[What was the dominant medical sect in the United States during the 19th Century?]]*[[What were the causes of the Northern Renaissance?]]*[[What was the Second Wave Feminist Movement?]]</div>{{Mediawiki:Medical History}}
===References===
<references/>
[[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:Women's History]] [[Category:Gender History]] [[Category:Gender and Sexuality]] [[Category:United States History]] [[Category:Medical History]]
{{Contributors}}
