Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

What if the Battle of Qadisiyyah Had a Different Result

1,026 bytes added, 11:48, 19 April 2017
The Historical Circumstances
==The Historical Circumstances==
In 636 CE, there were two major universal religions, which were Christianity and Zoroastrianism. These faiths were supported by the two major superpowers of the Middle East, which were the Byzanitine and Sasanian Empires. Both these powers seemed invincible and held much great wealth. However, by the early 7th century CE, major wars across the Middle East devastated much of the region and led to both these empires to deplete their resources.
 
In 636, Caliph Umar had re-invaded Iraq, after a previous Muslim army was defeated and removed from the region. The battle was mostly fought by a relatively inexperienced Arab army against the better trained and equipped Persians. However, a key turning point was reinforcements to the Arabs, who were much more professional soldiers, arrived at the battle of Qadisiyyah on the second day. These numbered about 5000 and proved to be the difference in allowing the Arabs to breakthrough the Persian main line, causing them to routed and forcing the main Persian force to retreat.
==Implications of the Battle==

Navigation menu