15,697
edits
Changes
no edit summary
__NOTOC__
[[File:Bart One.jpg|thumbnail|300px|left|Painting of the St Bartholomew Day’s Massacre]]
The St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) was one of the bloodiest episodes in Early Modern French history. It marked a turning point in the religious wars that devastated France from the 1560s to 1590s. The impact of the massacre was profound. They are generally acknowledged to have changed the course of French history and initiated a new and bloody chapter in the Wars of Religion. The massacre began a series of events that changed the Huguenots and weakened the French monarchy. The massacre will also be shown to have failed to have achieved its objectives and instead of ending the war, prolonged it.
== Failure of the Massacre==
Those behind the conspiracy had not premeditated the mass murder of Protestants. They had simply seized an opportunity offered to them by the wedding of Henry of Navarre and Charles X sister <ref>Sutherland. M. The Massacre of St. Bartholomew and the European conflict, 1559-1572 (Longman, London, 1973), p. 134</ref>. The Huguenot community was agitated by the attempted assassination of Coligny and the Guise faction appeared to have used this to persuade the Royal family to participate in their plan. The Guise plan was to kill or arrest the Huguenot leadership not a wholesale massacre of Protestants. If the French Huguenot leaders such as Conde, Coligny and Henry Navarre were eliminated or detained, it was expected that the French Protestant cause would be at least weakened or even fatally wounded .<ref>Dienfendorf, p. 115</ref>. The Duke of Guise persuaded Catherine de Medici, the Queen Mother of the benefits of his plan and she used her considerable influence on her son, the king to agree to the plan. The plan at first went well. The plotters were able to kill or imprison all their targets and it seemed that the Huguenot party was left leaderless.
The Parisian mob, whipped up by fiery Catholic preachers attacked the Huguenot population of the city.<ref> Sutherland, p 116</ref> This had not been foreseen by the planners and was not wanted by them. The King tried to stop the violence but it took a full week before the royal guard restored order in the city. The violence spread to other cities and towns, and the Guise faction hoped that the Huguenots would be annihilated. This was not the case. The Huguenots were more determined than ever to fight for their religion. Despite the fact that, their leadership was either killed or imprisoned they were still well-organized and well-led.<ref>Sutherland, p. 117</ref> The Huguenots still have many strongholds and a formidable army. They also had the support of foreign Protestants. The massacres did not fundamentally weaken the French Protestant cause as expected. This was borne out when French Catholic army attacked Huguenot strongholds. They laid siege unsuccessfully to several French Protestant strongholds. After two years of fighting the Catholics had not achieved any of their objectives and the fourth religious war was another stalemate. By 1594 a peace agreement was thrashed out and although the Huguenots lost some privileges and rights they had survived the Catholic onslaught. It could be argued that the French monarchy was weakened by its ill-advised participation in the St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre as they had alienated the Huguenots and they became ever more dependent on hardline Catholics.<ref> Dienfendorf, p. 95</ref>
==Weakened Huguenot Cause==
[[File: Bart Three.jpg|thumbnail|200px|Contemporary woodcut of the St Bartholomew Day’s Massacre]]
The massacres greatly weakened the Huguenot cause. The entire leadership of the French Protestants was either killed or arrested. The loss of Admiral Coligny was a particular blow to the French Protestant cause. The Huguenots were all but leaderless for some time. Then the remaining leaders were badly divided among themselves. The Bourbon Prince Henri of Navarre was given a choice during the massacre, this was to convert to Catholicism or to die.<ref>Fernández-Armesto, A and Wilson, D. <i>Reformation: Christianity and the World 1500 – 2000</i> (Bantam Press, London, 1996) 236-37</ref> Henri agreed and this saved his life and when he later rejoined the Protestant cause he was a divisive figure whom many did not trust. Then there was a dramatic change in the distribution of French Protestants in the country. Prior to the massacres, the Huguenots had a presence in nearly all of France, after the massacre of St Bartholomew this was no longer the case.<ref> Sutherland, p. 212</ref> Increasingly the Huguenots were forced back into their strongholds in the south and the west. Many Huguenots from elsewhere in France made their way to Protestant strongholds for safety during the massacres in the autumn of 1572. Then there was a large number of abjurations. These were cases when Huguenots renounced their faith and swore to recognize Catholicism as the one and true religion. Reports at the time suggest that several thousand Protestant abjured their faith in Paris alone.<ref> Dienfendorf, p. 145</ref>
Many of those who abjured their Protestant faith did so in order to save their lives. They were forced to abjure their faith at the point of the sword or after torture. However, for the majority of the Huguenot population, the massacre proved to them that there could be no compromise with the Catholics or the king. Many Huguenot preachers denounced the Catholic Church as the Anti-Christ and called for an unending struggle against it. The Massacres made the French Protestants more committed to their struggles. As a result, the war became even bloodier and more brutal<ref> Fernández-Armesto, and Wilson, p. 237</ref>. The religious wars that followed the St Bartholomew Day’s Massacre became even bloodier and the rules of war no longer applied to the conflict. The Huguenots knew that they faced extermination if they were defeated in the religious wars and this prolonged the conflict. After the St Bartholomew Day’s massacre, France was to suffer a series of religious wars until 1598<ref>Fernández-Armesto, and Wilson, p. 229</ref>.
==Conclusion==
The St Bartholomew Day’s Massacre resulted in the death of up to 10,000 people. It changed the nature of the religious war in France. The wars became more vicious after the massacre the numbers of people killed rose greatly This reflected the sectarian hatreds unleashed by the massacres. The massacre was intended to end the war or at least to weaken the Huguenot cause. The massacre did weaken the French Protestants but they rallied and fought fiercely. This is because after the massacre they knew that defeat meant extermination. They were also decidedly more militant and less willing, to compromise. The massacre did not end the war as expected by Guise and others it only prolonged the war. From a strategic point of view, the massacre was a complete failure. The religious wars dragged on until 1598 and by the time some historians based on parish records believe that some three million people died as a direct and indirect consequence of the sectarian conflicts<ref> Dienfendorf, p. 155</ref>.
<div class="portal" style="width:85%;">
==Related DailyHistory.org Articles==
*[[How did the Bubonic Plague make the Italian Renaissance possible]]
*[[Top 10 Books on the origins of the Italian Renaissance]]
*[[Why did the Reformation fail in Renaissance Italy?]]
*[[What were the causes of the Northern Renaissance?]]
*[[Why did the Italian Renaissance End?]]
</div>
{{Mediawiki:Renaissance History}}
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:French History]] [[Category:Religious History]] [[Category:European History]][[category:wikis]]
{{Contributors}}
