Changes

[[File:William-wallace-monument-1256291 1280.jpeg|thumbnail|left|250px|Monument to William Wallace at in Sterling, Scotland.]]<i>This article contains spoilers.</i>Braveheart was a very popular movie released in 1995 that won 5 Oscars and featured Mel Gibson playing the role of as William Wallace, . Wallace was a Scottish knight who became a hero in the Scottish rebellions against the English in the late 13th and early 14th centurycenturies. The significance of the movie is it helped to inspire Scottish national pride while also, to some, represent an early, Medieval warrior who fought for freedom for himself and his people.  While much of the story depicted did occur, including the English occupation of Scotland during the time of Edward I, king of England, the depiction of the revolt against the English and other events do not correspond well to historical accounts.

====Early Years of William Wallace====In the movie, William Wallace is suggested to have traveled in Europe during the early years of Edward I's occupation of Scotland. However, in reality little is known about Wallace's early years. First, it is assumed Wallace came from a noble family; two villages are often claimed as his birth places birthplaces (Elderslie and Ellerslie), both on the western part of Scotland .<ref>For more on Wallace's early development years before he revolted against the English, see: Cushing, H. (2010). <i>The life of Sir William Osler. </i> [Vol. 1]: [...] (Nachdr. der Orig.-Ausg., Oxford. Hamburg: Severus Verl.</ref>. We do know that Wallace was an experienced swordsman and knight, which indicates he may have fought in wars prior to his own rebellion and participation in the wars against the English. In fact, one possibility is he fought with king Edward I as a mercenary during that king's wars against the Welsh. That may have been the most feasible path for him to have gained fighting experience and possibly learn about English war tactics.<ref>For more on William Wallace the knight, see: Brown, C. (2005). <i>William Wallace: The True Story of Braveheart.</i> Stroud: Tempus.</ref>

==Revolt Against the English==In the movie, the trigger We know that led to William Wallace to fight against the English was the death of an experienced swordsman and knight, indicating he may have fought in wars before his wife own rebellion and participation in 1297, who was killed by the wars against the English. In fact, no records exist of William Wallace having ever been married. However, a later poem did mention one possibility is he had fought with King Edward I as a wife mercenary during that was killed and it led him to seek revenge. More likely, Wallace was either ambitious to break English authority or resented English occupation of his ancestral lands. This could have been a more likely trigger for him to become one of the chief early rebels. In fact, in the movie, Wallaceking's actions are suggested as the trigger to a wider rebellion that started wars against the EnglishWelsh. However, a rebellion across various parts of Scotland had already started, with William Wallace joining William, Lord of Douglas as an ally. One of the first major acts of rebellion was the assassination of the Sheriff of Lanark, William Heselrig. The account by Thomas Grey does indicate a woman or girl present with William Wallace. Some have suggested this was his wife. Similar to the movie, Wallace That may have left been the town initially then came back with some supporters most feasible path for him to lead an attack where the Sheriff was then killed. As the events occurred at the same time as other rebellious acts across Scotland, the attack may have been a premeditated gained fighting experience and coordinated eventpossibly learn about English war tactics.<ref>For more on the events that led up to the Battle of Sterling Bridge and William Wallace's murder of , the Sheriff of Lanarkknight, see: TranterBrown, N. GC. (19752005). <i>William Wallace: The WallaceTrue Story of Braveheart.</i> LondonStroud: CoronetTempus.</ref>

After ====Revolt Against the murder of English====In the sheriffmovie, William Wallace took some time to organize his forces, as other parts of Scotland began to rebel and side with fighting against the spreading rebellion. While Wallace was portrayed as the leader English after his wife's death in this revolt1297, several peoplewho, in addition according to Wallacetot the movie, began to lead was killed by the early rebellionEnglish. The first major battle In fact, no records exist of William Wallace fought in was the Battle of Sterling Bridge, which occurred on September 11, 1297. This battle was a turning point as it gave Wallace his fighting reputationhaving ever been married. In the movieHowever, the English are tricked into marching their heavy cavalry into a trap, with the resulting infantry slaughtered in later poem mentioned he had a futile charge.<ref>For more on the Battle of Sterling Bridge and Wallace's rolewife killed, see: Magnusson, Mwhich led him to seek revenge. (2001). <i>Scotland: The Story of a Nation</i> (Paperback ed). London: HarperCollins.</ref> In realityMore likely, the battle Wallace was won by the Scottish because the either ambitious to break English became trapped on Sterling Bridge, where they were not able to use their superior numbers. Many authority or resented his ancestral lands' English soldiers fell in the river and likely died from drowning as the bridge may have collapsed during the battleoccupation. The victory by Wallace may have largely occurred because the English assumed Wallace would let them cross the bridge, as that This may have been considered more in line with the rules why he became one of war or assumed rules at the timeleading early Scottish rebels. In effect, Braveheart also suggests that Wallace may have won because he simply didn't follow this rule, realizing the narrowing of the bridge could be used s actions in response to his advantage and launching the attack as wife's death triggered a wider rebellion against the English tried to cross.

It was after the battle that Wallace was likely named as guardian of the kingdom in March 1298.<ref>For more on how Wallace became guarding of However, a rebellion across various Scotlandparts had already started, see: Murison, A. F. (2003). <i>with William Wallace: Guardian joining William, Lord of Scotland.</i> MineolaDouglas, Nas an ally.Y: Dover Publications.</ref> In One of the movie, first major acts of rebellion was the noblemen are seen as less than trusting assassination of Wallace and more willing to give the English their loyalty. More likely, much Sheriff of Scotland was in open revoltLanark, although parts of it did stay under English control and there were noblemen loyal to the EnglishWilliam Heselrig. The account by Thomas Grey does indicate a woman or girl present with William Wallace. Notably, Edinburgh and its well fortified castle remained in English handsSome have suggested this was his wife. After Like the battlemovie, Wallace may have left the Scots began town initially then came back with some supporters to raid parts of northern England. The movie, lead an attack where the main city in the north, suggests York Sheriff was sacked, although this likely did not happenkilled. The raids of northern England in 1297 by Wallace, neverthelessAs the events occurred simultaneously with other rebellious acts across Scotland, the attack may have been momentous a premeditated and much destruction is suggested by contemporary chroniclerscoordinated event.<ref>For more on these raidsthe events that led up to the Battle of Sterling Bridge and Wallace's murder of the Sheriff of Lanark, see: Brown Tranter, CN. G. (20141975). <i>William The Wallace: The Man and the Myth.</i>London: Coronet.</ref> Such destruction was used by the English as part of their evidence against him when he was captured years later. The raids by Wallace were designed to provoke the English and undermine their authority, leading to potentially rebellion within England against the king. This forced Edward's hand into mounting a more serious invasion into Scotland.

After a period where a large English army then gathered the murder of the sheriff, Wallace took some time to invade organize his forces, as other parts of Scotlandbegan to rebel and side with the spreading rebellion. While Wallace was portrayed as the leader in this revolt, where several people and Wallace began to lead the Scots were mostly content with raiding these forces, a pitched early rebellion. The first major battle finally occurred at William Wallace fought in was the Battle of Falkirk Sterling Bridge, which occurred on July 22September 11, 12981297. Edward saw his chance their This battle was a turning point as the Scots willingly it gave him battle rather than continue their raiding of English forcesWallace his fighting reputation. This time, and similar to In the movie, the Scots were decimated by English longbowmenare tricked into marching their heavy cavalry into a trap, with the resulting infantry slaughtered in a futile charge.<ref>For more on the Battle of FalkirkSterling Bridge and Wallace's role, see: HentyMagnusson, G. AM. (20022001). <i>In Freedom’s CauseScotland: A The Story of Wallace and Bruce.a Nation</i> Mineola, N(Paperback ed).YLondon: DoverHarperCollins.</ref> However, it is very unlikely that Robert the Bruce, future king of Scotland and leader of the Scottish revolt, betrayed Wallace, as suggested in the movie. In fact, the movie suggests rather than Wallace's failure, it was a lack of Scottish support that cost him the battle. More likely, the main failure of the battle may have been poor planning on the part of Wallace, who may have done better by simply harassing the English forces from a distance rather than face a far larger enemy in open combat. After the battle, he may have been so humiliated that he willing resigned his role as guarding of Scotland or was stripped of this title.

In reality, the battle was won by the Scottish because the English became trapped on Sterling Bridge, where they were not able to use their superior numbers. Many English soldiers fell in the river and likely died from drowning as the bridge may have collapsed during the battle. Wallace's victory may have largely occurred because the English assumed Wallace would let them cross the bridge, as that may have been considered more in line with the rules of war or assumed rules at the time. In effect, Wallace may have won because he didn't follow this rule, realizing the bridge's narrowing could be used to his advantage and launching the attack as the English tried to cross. It was after the battle that Wallace was likely named as guardian of the kingdom in March 1298.<ref>For more on how Wallace became guarding of Scotland, see: Murison, A. F. (2003). <i>William Wallace: Guardian of Scotland.</i> Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.</ref> In the movie, the noblemen are seen as less than trusting Wallace and more willing to give the English their loyalty. More likely, much of Scotland was in open revolt, although parts of it did stay under English control, and there were noblemen loyal to the English. Notably, Edinburgh and it is well-fortified castle remained in English hands. After the battle, the Scots began to raid parts of northern England. The movie, the main city in the north, suggests York was sacked, although this likely did not happen. The raids of northern England in 1297 by Wallace, nevertheless, may have been momentous and much destruction is suggested by contemporary chroniclers.<ref>For more on these raids, see: Brown, C. (2014). <i>William Wallace: The Man and the Myth.</i></ref> Such destruction was used by the English as part of their evidence against him when he was captured years later. Wallace's raids were designed to provoke the English and undermine their authority, leading to potential rebellion within England against the king. This forced Edward's hand into mounting a more serious invasion into Scotland.  <dh-ad/> After a period where a large English army then gathered to invade Scotland, where the Scots were mostly content with raiding these forces, a pitched battle finally occurred at the Battle of Falkirk on July 22, 1298. Edward saw his chance there as the Scots willingly gave him battle rather than continue their English forces' raiding. This time, and similar to the movie, the Scots were decimated by English longbowmen.<ref>For more on the Battle of Falkirk, see: Henty, G. A. (2002). <i>In Freedom’s Cause: A Story of Wallace and Bruce.</i> Mineola, N.Y: Dover.</ref> However, it is implausible that Robert the Bruce, the future king of Scotland and the Scottish revolt leader, betrayed Wallace, as suggested in the movie. In fact, the movie suggests rather than Wallace's failure. It was a lack of Scottish support that cost him the battle. More likely, the battle's main failure may have been poor planning on the part of Wallace, who may have done better by simply harassing the English forces from a distance rather than face a far larger enemy in open combat. After the battle, he may have been so humiliated that he willingly resigned his role as guarding Scotland or was stripped of this title. ==Death of ==How did William Wallacedie?====

After the defeat at Falkirk, Wallace may have left for France or even Rome for a period of time. It is possible he was seeking assistance from the French and Pope for the Scottish cause. This is likely since there were wars between the French and English at this time , and Wallace would have tried to appeal to a willing English enemy if he could. Sometime around 1304, Wallace likely returned to England and continued to raid parts of English occupied Scotland.<ref>For events after the Battle of Falkirk in Wallace's life, see: Hamilton, J. S. (2010). <i>The Plantagenets: History of a Dynasty</i>. London ; New York: Continuum, pg. 79.</ref>  The movie depicts an aging Edward I as being tormented by William Wallace. The attacks were shown as successful skirmishes in most cases, but it is likely these attacks were either likely negligible, failures, or were insignificant to affect . They did not have a meaningful impact on the English presence in Scotland. More likely, Edward I probably most likely did not consider Wallace a major threat at this point and because Wallace was more struggling to raise an army after the disaster at Falkirk.  Additionally, he probably had a weakened position in Scotland. As suggested in the movie, Wallace was betrayed by a desperate state trying Scottish noble (John de Menteith) who was loyal to Edward in 1305. Wallace was captured and soon put on trial for treason at Westminster Palace. At the trial, he did seem to say that he was not guilty of treason because he never claimed loyalty to raise the English crown. This was depicted in the movie. However, he was also charged with other offenses, such as pillaging civilians. This charge was probably true because he did lead raids into northern England.  By the end of August 1305, Wallace was found guilty and drawn and quartered, a death reserved for traitors. Wallace's body parts and head were displayed in different parts of England to make an example against those considering revolting against the English king.<ref>For more on the capture and execution of William Wallace, see: Ross, D. R. (2005). <i>For Freedom: The Lasts Days of William Wallace</i>. Edinburgh: Luath Press.</ref> Despite Wallace's death, he is shown as gaining revenge by impregnating the king of England's future consort, Edward II's wife, Isabella of France. In reality, Isabella would have been no older than 9 years of age at this time and not yet married to Edward II.<ref>For more on Isabella and her life, see: Warner, K. (2016). <i>Isabella of France, The Rebel Queen: The Story of the Queen who Deposed her Husband, Edward II.</i> Gloucestershire, England: Amberley Publishing.</ref> She was not even in England at this time. While Edward II is portrayed as effeminate, historical records do indicate he was possibly gay. But his role in English rule was not significant force until after his father's reign. However, because Edward II was a relatively weak king, the disaster at FalkirkScots did successfully rebel against him.

In factRobert the Bruce, because he probably now had a weakened position in Scotlandmany ways, was far more successful than William Wallace was betrayed. He successfully rebelled against England, and Scotland regained its independence under his reign. The Battle of Bannockburn, as suggested in by the movie, by was a Scottish noble (John de Menteith) who was loyal to Edward in 1305major turning point. Wallace Bannockburn was captured and soon put on trail for treason at Westminster Palace, where he did seem to say that he was not guilty the culmination of treason, the charge he was tried with, because he never claimed loyalty to years fighting the Scots and English crown. Nevertheless, as depicted in the movie. Howeversuggests, he was also charged with other offenses. Among the charges brought against him were those related to his pillaging of civilians, which was probably at least partially true, during his raids in the north of England. By the end of August 1305, Wallace was found guilty and drawn and quartered, a death reserved for traitors. WallaceScots did gain their independence after Edward I's body parts and head were displayed in different parts of England to make an example against those considering of revolting against the English king.<ref>For more on the capture and execution of William Wallace, see: Ross, D. R. (2005). <i>For Freedom: The Lasts Days of William Wallace</i>. Edinburgh: Luath Pressreign.</ref>

Despite Wallace's death, he is shown as gaining revenge by impregnating the future consort ====Conclusion====Much of the king of England, Edward II's wife, Isabella of France. In fact, at this point shortly before William Wallace's death, Isabella would have life has now been no older than 9 years of age and not yet married to Edward II.<ref>For more on Isabella and her lifesteeped in myth, see: Warner, K. (2016). <i>Isabella of France, The Rebel Queen: The Story of the Queen who Deposed her Husband Edward II.</i> Gloucestershire, England: Amberley Publishing.</ref> In other words, she was not even where in England yet. While Edward II actuality very little is portrayed as effeminate, where historical records do indicate he was possibly homosexual, his role was not significant until after his father's reign. However, because Edward II was a relatively weak king, this did allow the Scots to successfully rebel against known about him. In fact, Robert Most of what we know derives from primary accounts center around the Bruce, battles from 1297-1298 and captured in many waysAugust 1305. Nevertheless, was far more successful than William Wallacedid, as he successfully rebelled from the English and Scotland regained its independence under his reign. The Battle of Bannockburn, as suggested by the movie, was a major turning pointfor various reasons, although many years of fighting and rebellion occurred before and after that battle between the Scots and English. Nevertheless, as the movie suggests, the Scots did gain their independence after the reign of Edward Isymbolic importance.

<div class="portal" style=Conclusion"width:85%;">====Related DailyHistory.org Articles====*[[British Criminal and Legal History Top Ten Booklist]]*[[How did Winston Churchill become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in World War Two?]]*[[Was Elizabeth I Justified in having her Cousin Mary Stuart, Queen of Scotland Executed?]]*[[How does The Magna Carta influence the Modern Perceptions of Civil Rights?]]*[[Privateering during the War of 1812: Interview with Faye M. Kert]]*[[Did the Congress of Berlin create a more unstable Europe?]]</div>

Much of William Wallace's life has now been steeped in myth, where in actuality very little is known about him. Most of what we do know deriving from primary accounts center around the battles from 1297-1298 and when he was captured in August 1305. Nevertheless, William Wallace did, for various reason, gain a symbolic importance. Later stories, such as <i>Exploits and Death of William Wallace ====References====<references/i> helped to create a romantic and tragic character, perhaps more similar to later figures rather than William Wallace. Nevertheless, the significance of William Wallace is evident to the national character of Scotland where today many statues and monuments are dedicated to him.