Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
{{Mediawiki<youtube>https:kindleoasis}}//www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BmGw3a-JDQ</youtube>  
[[File:466px-John_T._Hoffman_(portrait_by_Jacob_Lazarus).png|thumbnail|left|250px|John T. Hoffman Governor of New York vetoed the medical licensing law]]
__NOTOC__
In 1872, American physicians were not licensed anywhere in the United States. Medicine was completely unregulated , and anyone could claim to be a physician. Most American physicians could be classified as either a regularsregular, homeopaths , or eclectics. These three medical sects were in brutal competition with each other. Regulars were part of a medical sect that could trace its roots to ancient Rome. Homeopaths and eclectics were part of medical sects that had been founded in the 18th and early 19th centuries. The ineffectiveness of Regular medical practice 's ineffectiveness encouraged people to explore new medical ideas that led to the creation for distinct medical sects. These new medical groups found willing patients who were understandably skeptical of traditional medicine.
These three sects were operating in an environment unencumbered by any meaningful regulation. Over the next thirty years, that would change dramatically. While regular physicians were predisposed to advocating for some type of medical licensing, state legislatures had so far expressed little interest in creating any medical licensing. Up until that point , nothing had occurred to galvanize widespread support for medical licensing until the summer of 1872.
====A Tragic Death====In late August 1872 in New York City, a young pregnant woman named Alice Augusta Bowlsby read an advertisement in the newspaper for a Dr. Ascher. The advertisement stated that Dr. Ascher could help “[l]adies in trouble, guaranteed immediate relief, sure and safe; no fee required until perfectly satisfied; elegant rooms and nursing provided.”<ref> ''New York Herald'', classified advertisement, August 29, 1871.</ref> Bowlsby went to Ascher’s office , where he performed an abortion. Bowlsby died from Ascher’s botched abortion, and her tragic death provided an opportunity for New York’s organized Regulars to open the debate for medical licensing.
Bowlsby’s death captured the attention of the ''New York Times'' and the ''New York Herald'' because the details of her death were incredibly salacious. After Bowlsby died, Ascher attempted to hide the woman’s death by shipping her body in a ramshackle trunk to Chicago by train. After an alert railroad employee searched the trunk, police authorities were quickly contacted and conducted an autopsy on the body. The coroner determined that the young woman died from several “severe lacerations” that “had been sustained in the attempt to affect an abortion.” The police quickly ascertained the identity of the young women and tracked down Jacob Rosenzweig, a 39-year-old Polish physician. The police learned that Rosenzweig practiced in New York City under the name Dr. Ascher.<ref> Newspaper accounts refer to Rosenzweig as both Rosenweig and Rosenzweig.</ref>
The ''Times'' relentlessly reported on the Bowlsby case because it was not only a headline-grabber, but it gave allowed the newspaper an opportunity to batter one of its chief rivals, the ''New York Herald''. The Times had a golden opportunity to accuse the Herald of enabling abortionists and hypocrisy. Soon after Bowlsby’s death, the Herald ran an editorial condemning abortionists. However, but the Herald’s editorial staff failed to notice that Rosenweig’s alias, Dr. Ascher, still advertised in the Herald's classified section. NaturuallyNaturally, the Times was overjoyed at the chance to castigate the Herald. While the Times may have had difficulty containing its glee, a quick scan of the ''New York Times'' classified section reveals that it, too, ran numerous advertisements for dubious doctors. The Bowlsby case was not the first abortion case to get publicity in 1871 in New York City. The New York City police had previously arrested two other physicians, Dr. Michael Wolff and Dr. Thomas Lookup Evans, for performing abortions that year. Both cases garnered media interest in New York City, but they led to any broader medical community action. Dr. Michael Wolff was convicted of second-degree manslaughter after the death of one of his patients. In that case, the presiding judge, Gunning Bedford, sentenced Wolff to seven years in prison and began a New York City campaign to stamp out an abortion. Bedford also presided over the trial of the other abortionist, Lookup Evans. Evans was charged with performing an abortion that killed twins. The Times refused to describe Evans’ alleged crime in the newspaper because it was of such a “revolting character” that it was completely “unfit for publication.”<ref> “Lookup Evans Again.” ''New York Times'', May 13, 1871, 2.</ref> ====Establishing Medical Licensing====Judge Bedford spoke to the New York Academy of Medicine members on September 30th at the start of the Bowlsby case. These prominent abortion cases convinced Bedford that New York City was “living in an atmosphere of abortion.” He stated that the authorities would “strain every nerve until these traffickers in human life are exterminated and driven from existence.” Aside from prosecuting abortionists under the law, Bedford argued that the legislature should change the penalty for abortion or abortion-related deaths from second-degree manslaughter to first-degree murder. If convicted of first-degree murder, doctors could be executed for botched abortions.<ref> “Judge Bedford’s Late Charge on Abortion – Complimentary Resolutions by the New York Academy of Medicine,” September 30, 1871, ''New York Times''.</ref> At the same meeting, members of the New York Academy of Medicine passed a resolution promising to “promote public health and public morals” and pledged to support “any legislative or other measures” advocated by law enforcement officials to “remove the pestilence of criminal abortion.”<ref> Judge Bedford’s Late Charge on Abortion – Complimentary Resolutions by the New York Academy of Medicine, September 30, 1871, ''New York Times''.</ref>
The Bowlsby case was not the first abortion case to get publicity in 1871 in New York City. The New York City police had previously arrested two other physicians, Dr. Michael Wolff and Dr. Thomas Lookup Evans, for performing abortions that year. Both cases garnered media interest in New York City, but they did lead to any broader action by the medical community. Dr. Michael Wolff was convicted of second<dh-degree manslaughter after the death one of his patients. The presiding judge in that case, Gunning Bedford, sentenced Wolff to seven years in prison and began a campaign in New York City to stamp out abortion. Bedford also presided over the trial of the other abortionist, Lookup Evans. Evans was charged with performing an abortion that killed twins. The Times refused to describe Evans’ alleged crime in the newspaper because it was of such a “revolting character” that it was completely “unfit for publication.”<ref> “Lookup Evans Again.” ''New York Times'', May 13, 1871, 2.<ad/ref>
==Establishing Medical Licensing==Judge Bedford spoke to the Bowlsby’s “Trunk Murder” and Bedford’s campaign merged and convinced members of the New York Academy of Medicine on September 30th at the start of within the Bowlsby case. These prominent abortion cases convinced Bedford medical community that New York City it was “living in an atmosphere of abortiontime they eliminated abortionists from their ranks. He stated that Abortionists undermined doctors' already questionable reputations and lowered the authorities would “strain every nerve until these traffickers profession's standing in human life be exterminated and driven from existence.” Aside from prosecuting abortionists under the law, Bedford argued that the legislature should change the penalty for abortion or abortion-related deaths from second-degree manslaughter to first-degree murderpublic’s eyes. If convicted of first-degree murder, doctors could be executed for botched abortions.<ref> “Judge In step with Bedford’s Late Charge on Abortion – Complimentary Resolutions by proposal ratcheting up the New York Academy of Medicine,” September 30, 1871, ''New York Times''.</ref> At the same meetingabortion laws, members of the New York Academy of Medicine passed a resolution promising medical community argued that doctors had to “promote public health and public morals” and pledged to support “any legislative or other measures” advocated be regulated by law enforcement officials the state to “remove stem the pestilence city's tide of criminal tragic abortioncases.”<ref> Judge Bedford’s Late Charge on Abortion – Complimentary Resolutions by Prominent Regular physicians wanted to stigmatize physicians who performed abortions with medical licensing. Regular physicians began to argue that medical licensing was the New York Academy of Medicine, September 30, 1871, ''New York Times''only effective way to stop abortionists from plying their trade.</ref>
Bowlsby’s “Trunk Murder” ====Lobbying Physicians====“Medical and Bedford’s campaign merged legal members” of the New York Medico-Legal Society had drafted “An Act to Protect the People against Quackery and convinced members within the medical community that Crime” two years earlier, but it was time they eliminated abortionists from their ranksreceived little or legislative support. Abortionists undermined Soon after the already questionable reputations Bowlsby case, Stephen Rogers, M.D., a member of doctors the Medical Society of the State of New York and lowered the profession's standing in President of the public’s eyes. In step with Bedford’s proposal ratcheting up the abortion lawsNew York Medico-Legal Society, members of believed that it was critical for the New York medical community argued to stamp out abortion and focused the Medico-Legal Society on that mission. Not surprisingly, he believed that doctors had a medical licensing law was the best way to be regulated by do it. Rogers’s primary goals as the state society's president weree to stem pass medical licensing and new severe abortion law. The Times reported on January 12, the tide Medico-Society proposed a “bill against quacks” that authorized the creation of tragic abortion cases in the citycounty medical societies. Prominent Regular physicians wanted to stigmatize physicians These county societies would each appoint five censors who preformed abortions with medical licensingwould examine “resident practitioners. Regular The proposed bill permitted prosecuting any unlicensed physicians began “for obtaining money under pretenses.” After the Medico-Legal Society approved the draft bill, it agreed to argue that medical licensing was print copies of the bill for distribution around the only effective way to stop abortionists from plying their tradestate.<ref>“Medical-Legal Society: A Bill Against Quacks,” ''New York Times'', Jan. 12, 1872, 8.</ref>
==Lobbying Physicians==“Medical and legal members” Rogers, along with other members of the Regular sect, accepted that the state’s failure to regulate physicians permitted abortionists to prosper. An East River Medical Association of New York Medico-Legal Society had drafted “An Act to Protect report discussing abortion argued that “the unrestricted practice of medicine was the main cause for the People against Quackery and Crime” two years earlier, but it received little or legislative supportexistence of professional abortionists. Soon after the Bowlsby case, Stephen Rogers, MThe report contended that only medical licensing could eliminate abortion.D<ref>James C.Mohr, a member ''Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy'', (Oxford University Press, 1978), 160, citing the East River Medical Society Association, Report of the State of Special Committee Criminal Abortions, (New York and the President of the New York Medico, 1871), 3-Legal Society, believed 4.</ref> While Rogers concluded that it was critical strengthening the penalties for the New York medical community to stamp out criminal abortion and focused the Medico-Legal Society on that mission. Not surprisinglywas important, he believed argued that a only medical licensing law was had the best way power to do itstop abortions. Rogers’ primary goals as the society's president was to pass Along with most Regular physicians, Rogers believed that most abortionists could not meet even minimum medical licensing and a new severe abortion lawrequirements. The Times reported on January 12 Even if a licensing board did give an abortionist a license, the Medico-Society proposed state’s Regulars contended that a “bill against quacks” which had authorized strong licensing board should be granted the creation of county medical societies. These county societies would each appoint five censors who would examine “resident practitioners.” The proposed bill permitted prosecuting any unlicensed physicians “for obtaining money under false pretenses.” After the Medico-Legal Society approved the draft bill, it agreed power to print copies of the bill revoke licenses for distribution around the state.<ref>“Medical Legal Society: A Bill Against Quacksunprofessional behavior,” ''New York Times'', Jansuch as performing abortions. 12, 1872, 8.</ref>
RogersRoger ended up lobbying numerous regular and irregular medical organizations including the New York County Medical Society, along with other members the Medical Society of New York, the Regular sectNew York State Medical Society, accepted that the state’s failure to regulate physicians permitted abortionists to prosper. An East River Medical Association of New York report discussing abortion argued that “the unrestricted practice chapter of medicine was the main case for the existence American Institute of professional abortionists.” The report contended that only medical licensing could eliminate abortionHomeopathy.<ref>James Csee Stephen Rogers, M.D. Mohr, “The True Object of Medical Legislation,” ''Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution Papers Read Before the Medico-Legal Society of National PolicyNew York From its Organization'', (Oxford University PressNew York: W.F. Vanden Houten, 19781882), 160, citing 117 and ''Transactions of the East River Medical Association, Report American Institute of the Special Committee Criminal AbortionsHomeopathy 1873'', (New York, 1871), 3Volume 26: 524-4525.</ref> While many individual physicians opposed licensing, Rogers concluded that strengthening the penalties for criminal abortion were important, he argued that only medical was able to garner support from a number of these organizations. The support of these institutions lent credibility to licensing had efforts and the power New York House and Senate to stop abortions. Rogers, along with most Regular physicians, believed that most abortionists could not meet even minimum pass these medical licensing requirements. Even if a licensing board did give an abortionist a license, the state’s Regulars contended that strong licensing board should be granted the power to revoke licenses for unprofessional behavior, such as performing abortionslaws.
Roger ended up lobbying numerous regular and irregular ====Conclusion====Ultimately, Governor John Thompson Hoffman vetoed the medical organizations including the New York County Medical Societylicensing bill, the Medical Society but this was one of New York, the New York State Medical Society, the New York chapter of earliest and most successful efforts to establish medical licensing in the American Institute of HomeopathyUnited States.<ref> see Stephen Rogers, M.D., “The True Object New Medical Law of Medical Legislation”, ''Papers Read Before the Medico-Legal Society State of New York From its Organization,” '' (New York: WMedical Journal'', Vol.F. Vanden HoutenXX, 1882)July 1874, 117 and ''Transactions of the American Institute of Homeopathy 1873'', Volume 26No. 1: 52470-52572.</ref> While many individual physicians opposed The medical community's efforts to pass medical licensing, Rogers was able to garner support from did not occur in a vacuum. Physicians throughout the United States were remarkably well connected. Organizations such as the American Medical Association served as a number of these hub for the national community. State and local organizations. The support across the country quickly became aware of these institutions lent credibility New York's medical community's attempt to enact medical licensing efforts and . In other states, medical groups would quickly follow the lead of their New York brethren. Unlike the New York House and Senate physicians, they started to become successful in their efforts to pass these medical licensing medical legislation. Similar to the physicians in New York, they tied licensing to other unrelated public health measures such as stronger anti-abortion lawsor sanitary legislation.<ref>Sandvick, Clinton (2016) ''Defining the Practice of Medicine: Licensing American Physicians, 1870-1907'' (2016).</ref>
<div class="portal" style=Conclusion==Ultimately, Governor John Thompson Hoffman vetoed the medical licensing bill, but this was one the earliest and most successful efforts to establish medical licensing in the United States. <ref>Stephen Rogers, M.D., “The New Medical Law of the State of New York,” ''New York Medical Journal'', Vol. XX, July 1874, No. 1: 70-72.</ref> The medical community's efforts to pass medical licensing did not occur in a vacuum. Physicians throughout the United States were remarkably well connected. Organizations such as the American Medical Association served as a hub for the national community. State and local organizations across the country quickly became aware of the attempt by New York's medical community to enact medical licensing. In other states, medical groups would quickly follow the lead of their New York brethren. Unlike the New York physicians, they started to become successful in their efforts to pass medical licensing medical legislation. Similiarly to the physicians in New York, they tied licensing to other unrelated public health measures such as stronger anti-abortion laws or sanitary legislation.<ref>Sandvick, Clinton (2016) ''Defining the Practice of Medicine"width: Licensing American Physicians, 1870-1907'' (2016).</ref85%;">
====Related DailyHistory.org Articles===={{#dpl:category=Medical History|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=8}}</div> ====References====
<references/>
[[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:United States History]] [[Category:19th Century History]] [[Category:Medical History]]  
{{Contributors}}
 
<div class="portal" style="width:85%;">
==Related DailyHistory.org Articles==
*[[What was the dominant medical sect in the United States during the 19th Century?]]
*[[How did Medicine develop in the Ancient World?]]
*[[Causes of World War II Top Ten Booklist]]
*[[Gilded Age/Progressive Era History Top Ten Booklist]]
</div>
{{Mediawiki:Medical History}}

Navigation menu