Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

How Did the 1967 War Shape the Middle East

202 bytes added, 07:13, 5 October 2016
no edit summary
==International Involvement==
[[File:President_Nasser's_visit_to_the_Suez_front_with_Egypt's_top_military_commanders_during_the_War_of_Attrition.jpg|thumbnail|275px|President Nasser visting Suez Front during the War of Attrition.]]
The U.S. would continue to play a large role in the region whether it liked it or not. Historian James Gelvin argues that the Egyptian War of Attrition (1969) against Israel specifically sought to re-engage the U.S. in the affairs of the Middle East.<ref>Gelvin, 275</ref> The War of Attrition destroyed the Suez Canal over the period of 1969-1970 and did lead to another response by the U.S. The U.S. Rogers Plan proposed by the Secretary of State ended the War of Attrition in 1970. This meant that all parties accepted the ninety-day ceasefire set forth in the plan. However, tensions between Israel and her neighbors did not relax even after international involvement. In fact, Yasir Arafat stated, “We consider Israel as playing the new role of the East India Company in the Middle East.”<ref>Yasir Arafat interview 1969, as quoted in Walter Laqueur and Barry Rubin (ed) The Israel-Arab Reader (Penguin, 2001), 139</ref> This attitude suggests that increased Western involvement only led to suspicion and a renewed sense of imperial involvement.

Navigation menu