Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Why did Indian Removal cause the Trail of Tears

839 bytes added, 16:18, 15 June 2019
no edit summary
====Why Remove Native Americans?====
[[File: Andrew_Jackson_by_Ralph_E._W._Earl_1837.jpg|thumbnail|275px|left| Andrew Jackson (1837) by Ralph E. W. Earl]]
Why was Jackson so committed to removal? Jackson fundamentally believed that Native Americans represented a serious security risk to the United States. Jackson had taken part in the United States campaign against members of the Creek nation who followed Tecumseh in 1814. Tecumseh believed that the United States represented an existential threat to not only Creek tribe, but all Native Americans in the United States. Tecumseh lead a revolt against the United States to push back the advance of American settlers. Tecumseh's revolted was defeated at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend in 1814, but Jackson had already decided that Native Americans and US settlers could not live together peaceful. As a result the Tecumseh's defeat, Jackson imposed terms on the entire Creek nation that removed them from their ancestral lands.
Native Americans also held some of the farmlands in the Southeast United States. Several of these tribes had already begun to farm these lands and earnest and make them productive. Both states and settlers wanted to seize these agricultural lands from the Native Americans. The states, such as Georgia, cared little that Native Americans had placed farms on these lands, purchased slaves, or built homes. The tribes did not recognize the states authority over their lands, because they viewed themselves as independent nations.
<div class="portal" style='float:right; width:35%'>====Related Articles===={{#dpl:category=History of the Early Republic|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=6}}</div> 
====Andrew Jackson and The Removal Act 0f 1830====
Jackson strongly favored removing the 60,000 Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Creek and Seminole (the Civilized Tribes) from North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Mississippi. Indian Removal was one of Andrew Jackson's most important goals. It was so important that during Jackson’s first message to Congress, he asked for a bill and funds to move these tribes west of the Mississippi. Jackson's message was clear, Indians needed to permanently removed west of Louisiana.
</blockquote>
The first piece of legislation passed after Jackson took office was the 1830 Indian Removal Act. The 1830 Act was just a first step in a long process that forced Native American off their land to make way white settlers.
In general terms====Cherokee Legal Opposition====The Cherokee Nation resisted, however, Jackson’s government succeededchallenging in court the Georgia laws that restricted their freedoms on tribal lands. By the end of In his presidency, he had signed into law almost seventy removal treaties, 1831 ruling on Cherokee Nation v. the result State of which was to move nearly 50Georgia,000 eastern Indians to Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “the Indian Territory—defined as the region belonging territory is admitted to compose a part of the United States west of ,” and affirmed that the Mississippi River but excluding the states of Missouri tribes were “domestic dependent nations” and Iowa as well as “their relation to the Territory United States resembles that of Arkansas—and open millions of acres of rich land east of the Mississippi a ward to white settlershis guardian. Despite ” However, the vastness of following year the Supreme Court reversed itself and ruled that Indian Territory, tribes were indeed sovereign and immune from Georgia laws. President Jackson nonetheless refused to heed the government intended that the Indians’ destination would be a more confined area—what later became eastern OklahomaCourt’s decision.
====The Treaty of New Echota Splits the Cherokee Legal OppositionNation====The A minority faction of the Cherokee Nation resisted, however, challenging in court the Georgia laws nation led by John Ridge realized that restricted there was little they could do to prevent removal from their freedoms on tribal lands. In his 1831 ruling on Cherokee Nation v. the State Instead of Georgiafighting it, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “the Indian territory is admitted they decided to compose negotiate a part of treaty with the United States,” and affirmed that to get the tribes were “domestic dependent nations” best terms possible. The Cherokee Nation divided on between Ridge's Treaty Party and “their relation John Ross's National Party. A delegation was sent to the United States resembles that of negotiate a ward to his guardian.” However, the following year the Supreme Court reversed itself Treaty and ruled that Indian tribes they ultimately were indeed sovereign promised $5 million dollars and immune from Georgia laws. President Jackson nonetheless refused the right to heed hold the Court’s decisionlands in modern-day Oklahoma in perpetuity. He obtained Ridge's group agreed to the signature of a Cherokee chief agreeing to relocation in terms and received approval from the Treaty of Party in New Echota, which . Congress then ratified against the protests of Daniel Webster and Henry Clay in 1835. The Cherokee signing party represented only a faction of the Cherokee, and the majority followed Principal Chief John Ross in a desperate attempt to hold onto their land. This attempt faltered in 1838, when, under the guns of federal troops and Georgia state militia, the Cherokee tribe were forced to the dry plains across the Mississippi.
====Cherokee Removal and the Trail of Tears====
====Conclusion====
To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. As incentives, the law allowed the Indians financial and material assistance to travel to their new locations and start new lives and guaranteed that the Indians would live on their new property under the protection of the United States Government forever. With the Act in place, Jackson and his followers were free to persuade, bribe, and threaten tribes into signing removal treaties and leaving the Southeast. With the exception of a small number of Seminoles still resisting removal in Florida, by the 1840s, from the Atlantic to the Mississippi, no Indian tribes resided in the American South.  In general terms, Jackson’s government succeeded. By the end of his presidency, he had signed into law almost seventy removal treaties, the result of which was to move nearly 50,000 eastern Indians to Indian Territory—defined as the region belonging to the United States west of the Mississippi River but excluding the states of Missouri and Iowa as well as the Territory of Arkansas—and open millions of acres of rich land east of the Mississippi to white settlers. Despite the vastness of the Indian Territory, the government intended that the Indians’ destination would be a more confined area—what later became eastern Oklahoma. Through a combination of coerced treaties and the contravention of treaties and judicial determination, the United States Government succeeded in paving the way for the westward expansion and the incorporation of new territories as part of the United States.
[[Category:US State Department]] [[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:United States History]] [[Category:Colonial American Historyof the Early Republic]] [[Category:18th 19th Century History]] [[Category:Political History]] [[Category:Diplomatic History]][[Category:Native American History]]
* Select portions of this article are republished from [https://history.state.gov/| Office of the Historian, United States Department of State]
* Article: [https://history.state.gov/milestones/17501830-17751860/albanyindian-plantreaties| Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/indian-treaties]

Navigation menu