Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
[[File: Man in the iron mask 2.jpg|200px|thumb|left|King Louis XIV, the man who confined the mysterious prisoner]]
==The Man in the Iron Mask==
The latest research based on material released by the National Archives in Paris in 2015, has added much to our knowledge of the mysterious individual. All we know about the enigmatic prisoner is from the correspondence of the jail governor Bénigne d'Auvergne de Saint-Mars and an inventory of the goods of the inmate. In 1669 he was governor of the prison of Pignerol which is today near Turn, Italy but in the seventeenth century was part of the Kingdom of France. A Royal minister gave the governor a set of strict instructions with regard as to how the prisoner be treated <ref> Thompson, Harry. The Man in the Iron Mask: A historical detective investigation (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987), p 189</ref>. These instructions informed the jailer that his new prisoner was not a person of high rank and was to be kept in solitary confinement and forbidden to converse with another prisoner. He was to be kept locked behind a number of doors so that he could not communicate with anyone else in the prison. The jailer himself was under strict instruction not to speak with him. It was made clear that he was a prisoner of state and this meant that he had no legal rights and was completely under the jurisdiction of the monarch <ref>.Thompson, p 189</ref>. The name of the prisoner on the document was Eustache Dauger and it appears that he was arrested in Calais or Dunkirk, both ports in the North of France, and this may indicate that the prisoner had been trying to flee to England. In August 1669, the individual was sent all the way across France to the prison-fortress at Pignerol. This prison was one of the most notorious in France because it held so many inmates that were considered to be politically sensitive. Pignerol held only a few dozen inmates including a former Finance Minister and a noble who became engaged to the King’s cousin without his consent. The prisoner known as Dauger was despite the orders of the Minister in Paris, able to mingle with other prisoners. However, it appears that he was kept under strict surveillance at all times. He was the valet to an imprisoned Minister for a time and was a model prisoner and it appears that he was a very religious man. Saint-Mars was later appointed the governor of Sainte-Marguerite prison on one of the Lérins Islands, off the Rivera coast. He took the prisoner known as Dauger with him and one inmate who had apparently communicated with him. During the journey from Pingerol to the island prison stores circulated about an inmate who was masked <ref> Williamson, H.R., Who was the Man in the Iron Mask?: And Other Historical Mysteries (London, Penguin, 2002), p 19</ref>. It appears that Dauger was masked at all times and that he wore a velvet mask. It should be noted that Voltaire claimed that the inmate did not wear a velvet mask but one that was made of iron and which prevented him from speaking and this claim was later popularized by Alexander Dumas. The convict was detained on the island until 1689 when his jailer was transferred to the notorious Bastille in Paris. He was kept in a tower and in solitary confinement and his food was delivered to him by the Deputy Governor of the prison <ref>Williamson, p 36</ref>. His cell was spartan and he had little food and he must have endured a wretched existence. The inmate known as Dauger died apparently alone in November 1703. He had spent 34 years in prison. Interestingly he was buried under the name of Marchioly, and not Dauger. His former cell was stripped, and its walls whitewashed all his belongings were burned and any metal items that he touched or owned melted down. By his death it seems that many people had become aware of the Man in the Iron Mask and his life and alleged crimes, became a subject of gossip and inspired many conspiracy theories <ref>, Williamson, p. 134</ref>. [[File:File.png|200px|thumb|left|alt text]]
==The Royal Theory==
In the years after the death of the prisoner in a bare cell, there emerges a number of theories as to the identity of the prisoner. Many assumed that there was some sort of a relationship between the king and the prisoner. One that was proposed in the 18th century was that the prisoner was the elder twin of Louis XIV and this was popularized by Dumas in his novel<ref> Topin, Marius Jean François. The Man with the Iron Mask (London, Smith, Elder and Company, 1870), p 114</ref>. He was kept in an iron mask so that no-one would recognize him. If he was he could become the king. According to this theory, Louis XIV was not able to bring himself to kill his twin and devised the idea of imprisoning him and disguising his identity. There are several writers who believe that the disguised inmate who died alone in the Bastille was, in reality, the real father of Louis XIV. The ‘Sun King’ was born to Louis XIII (1601-1643) and his wife of Anne of Austria (1615-1666). There are those who have speculated that Louis XIII could not have children and that Anne of Austria had taken a lover, who was the real father of the future ‘Sun King’. He was imprisoned and kept in isolation so that he would not tell anyone that he was the former lover of the Queen and the real father of Louis XIV. Voltaire argued that the mysterious prisoner was the illegitimate half-brother of the king who ruled France for so many decades <ref>Topin, p 119</ref>. The great philosopher stated that the masked inmate was born from an affair between the powerful Cardinal Mazarin (1602-1661) and Queen Anne of Austria. There is no real evidence that the Man in the Mask was related to the French Royal Family <ref>Topin, p 156</ref>. It is highly unlikely that he was the twin of Louis XIV or his natural father. The main argument against this is the fact that the prisoner known as Dauger or Marchioly served as a valet during his time in prison, based on official records. Seventeenth-century France was obsessed with status and it would have been unthinkable for a member of the Royal family to work as a servant. It would not only have dishonored him but every Royal. Despite the popularity of the theory, it seems highly unlikely that the prisoner was related to the French monarch.

Navigation menu