15,697
edits
Changes
no edit summary
[[File:Playing_Indian.jpg|thumbnail|left|300px|<i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0300080670/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0300080670&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=a6aa91ef1bac6a98a4df201221a41366 Playing Indian]</i> by Philip Deloria]]Philip DelorisDeloria's <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0300080670/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0300080670&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=a6aa91ef1bac6a98a4df201221a41366 Playing Indian]</i> seeks to explain why white Americans have consistently mimicked or played Indian for the past two hundred fifty years. Deloria sought attempts to untangle the various reasons for this “persistent tradition in American culture.” (Deloria, 7.) Americans, according to Deloria, have usually played Indian to order define “themselves as a nation.” (Deloria, 5.) As an amalgamation of various European and African immigrants and Native Americans, the United States had an understandably unclear and muddled national identity. White Americans, Deloria suggests, sought to create something uniquely American. One of the key ways they accomplished this was by appropriating Indian dress and traditions to fashion and inspire a separate and distinct American character. While the specific rationale behind playing Indian changed from generation to generation, Americans adopted various aspects of Indian culture to aid them in this quest. While White Americans saw the utility in adopting some aspects of Indian culture, they struggled with whether they should only adopt the mythical and stereotypical perceptions of Indian society or if they should try accurately portray Native Americans.
Attempts by White Americans to precisely portray Indians often brought Americans into contact with real Indians who often challenged their preconceived notions of Indianness and even undermined their national identity creation efforts. Deloria’s book presents a unique explanation for the creation of the American national identity, but his conclusion is debatable and unverifiable. Some key questions need to be asked to assess the merits of his work: Has he misread the intentions or reasons why White Americans played Indian? Has he conflated a relatively innocuous and meaningless practice into a quest for an American identity? Does the trend spotted by Deloria represent mainstream efforts at identity creation or do these individuals represent a less significant attempt at creating a national identity?
