Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Why did Los Angeles adopt Cars instead of Mass Transit

8 bytes added, 05:52, 5 December 2018
no edit summary
The rail companies also faced exceptionally high costs to expand their rail networks. Neither company was able to effectively expand their rail lines after 1913 because they could not “attract investment capital.” Investors were unwilling to finance the companies because they were saddled with enormous debt loads. The companies were not particularly profitable, and investors were understandably concerned that PE and LARY could not service their debts.<ref>Bottles, 40</ref> LARY’s and PE’s inability to meet passenger needs could have angered many Angelinos.
<dh-ad/>
Finally, railroads had alienated Americans throughout the country during the last half of the nineteenth century because freight and passenger trains had “killed and maimed people with regularity” on America’s streets. Historian David Stowell argued that the railroads in Buffalo, New York in the 1870s had become extraordinarily unpopular among the city’s middle class. Middle-class Buffaloans had become angry with the railroads because they allied with rail workers during the “Great Strike” of 1877.<ref>See generally, Stowell, David. <i>Streets, Railroads and the Great Strike of 1877</i> (University of Chicago Press, 1999)</ref>

Navigation menu