Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

How Historically Accurate is the Outlaw King

2,136 bytes added, 17:39, 27 September 2021
m
[[File:Outlaw.jpeg|thumbnail|left|280px|The movie Outlaw King tells the tale of Robert the Bruce and his rise to the Scottish throne. ]]__NOTOC__Many of us know the story of <i>Braveheart</i>, where William Wallace leads a major rebellion against Edward I in the late 13th century. That movie did not only show the English as repressing the Scots but it also showed another prominent Scottish figure, Robert the Bruce, as being supplicant to the English and enabling their actions until finally he successfully revolts against the English during the reign of Edward II. Many historians had criticized this aspect, where Robert the Bruce was shown in a negative light. In fact, Robert the Bruce, along with many Scots, did for a time accept Edward I as the king, but Robert the Bruce may have actually simply weighted and calculated for an opportune time rather than risk a rebellion that was likely to fail. The Netflix movie <i>Outlaw King</i> tells his story and the making of Scotland that was free of English rule.
==The Main Story==The story begins with In fact, Robert the Bruce, along with other prominent Scottish noblesmany Scots, meeting with did for a time accept Edward I to accept him as their king in around 1306. They had already led a rebellion that was unsuccessful, where Edward I, Hammer of the Scots, had earned his nickname by winning against the Scots. Robert still wants to be king, as his family has ancient lineage to the thrown of Scotland, but other claimants exist for Robert the Scottish throne Bruce may have simply waited and none of them are in position to attack the English due to their strength and possession of many key areas of Scotland. John Comyn calculated for an opportune time rather than risk a rebellion that was another Scottish noble who also had perhaps just an equal or maybe even stronger claim likely to the Scottish throne.<ref>For more on the period before and the beginning of the Scottish rebellions against Edward I, see: Traquair, P. (1998)fail. The Netflix movie <i>Freedom’s sword: Scottland’s wars of IndependenceOutlaw King</i>tells his story and shows a fictional version of how Scotland freed themselves from English rule. London: HarperCollins. </ref>
William Wallace is ====The Main Story====The story begins with Robert the last major Bruce, along with other prominent Scottish figure not nobles, meeting with Edward I to accept Edward I him as their king. Eventually, after several years of being on the run and hiding in the highlands and other regions, William is killedearly 1300s. This is shown in the movie as inspiring They had already led a rebellion against that was unsuccessful, where Edward I, Hammer of the EnglishScots, that had earned his nickname by defeating the death of Wallace somehow triggers a nationalist rage that sparks Scots. Robert still wants to begin to plot to take back Scotland. As the Bruce begins to plot the rebellionbe king, he meets with Comyn in Greyfriars church. However, the two quickly make their own claims his family has ancient lineage to the throne of Scotland and Comyn does not show willingness to side with the Bruce against Edward I. This leads to Robert the Bruce striking and later Comyn dies, which leads to the Bruce being excommunicated but being absolved by other claimants exist for the Scottish church leaders as they promoted the rebellionthrone. Six weeks later, Bishop William de Lamberton crowned the Bruce King None of the Scots at Scone, which was the traditional place that Scottish kings were crowned. However, despite this, many Scottish nobles did not join his rebellion and he was betrayed, which almost led to his capture but he escaped with a few followers. In fact, at the Battle of Methven where the Bruce and his army was almost destroyed, Aymer de Valence defeated him claimants are in a surprise position to attack. After this, the Bruce may have spent the winter English because they are weak and English also possesses key areas of 1306-1307 in the HebridesScotland. His wife, Elizabeth de Burgh, John Comyn was hiding in Kildrummy Castle after this battle, but she was captured after a siege of another Scottish noble who might have had an even stronger claim to the castle that was guarded by Robert the Bruce's brother (Niall Bruce). After the castle fell, Niall Bruce was executedScottish throne.<ref>For more on the events at around period before and the time beginning of the Battle of MethvenScottish rebellions against Edward I, see: Saunders, C. J., Le Saux, F. H. M., & ThomasTraquair, N. (Eds.)P. (20041998). <i>Writing warFreedom’s sword: medieval literary responses to warfareScottland’s wars of Independence</i>. Cambridge ; Rochester, N.YLondon: D.S. Brewer, pg. 107HarperCollins. </ref>
From that time on, Robert William Wallace is the Bruce had realized last major Scottish figure not to defeat accept Edward I as the English he would have to conduct a most Guerilla warking. This proved to be very successful Eventually, after several years of being on the run and he began to have some success hiding in attacking the English in places they did not expecthighlands and other regions, William is killed. When he did next meet The movie shows that Wallace's death inspires rebellion against the English in battle, he wanted because his death sparks a nationalist rage that convinces Bruce to plot to choose take back Scotland. As the ground where Bruce begins to plan for the battle would berebellion, he meets with Comyn in Greyfriars church. In May 1307However, the advantage point for him was at Loundoun hill, two quickly make their own claims to the throne of Scotland and Comyn does not show a place that was trapped on either willingness to side by marsheswith the Bruce against Edward I. While This leads to a fight where Robert the Bruce was aware of this, the English were not. They saw his small army that was poorly equipped strikes and fell into his trapkills Comyn. They had also produced trenches that restricted English movements Comyn's death causes the Scottish Church to areas that were prepared with spearsexcommunicate Bruce. Robert Despite Bruce's excommunication, the Scottish church leaders absolve Bruce was attacked by Aymer and promote his rebellion. Six weeks later, Bishop William de Valence, once again, but this time he had made conditions perfect for his victoryLamberton crowned Bruce the King of the Scots at Scone, which he was able the traditional location where Scottish kings were crowned despite its close proximity to takean English garrison.
While However, many Scottish nobles failed to join his rebellion which almost led to Bruce's capture. Bruce escaped with a few followers at the movie ends there, it is clear Battle of Methven. Bruce and his army were almost destroyed in a night attack that had them unprepared as Aymer de Valence defeated him in a surprise attack. After this was a turning point, the Bruce may have spent the winter of 1306-1307 in the Hebrides after successfully escaping. Soon His wife, Elizabeth de Burgh, went into hiding in Kildrummy Castle after this battle, Edward II took over England from his father but she was captured after he had died and he a siege of the castle that was far less ableguarded by Robert the Bruce's brother (Niall Bruce). After the castle fell, Niall Bruce was executed.<ref>For more successful operations and defeat of on the English events at around the time of the Battle of BannockburnMethven, see: Saunders, C. J., Le Saux, where once again Robert the Bruce had to use creative tactics F. H. M., & Thomas, N. (Eds.). (2004). <i>Writing war: medieval literary responses to makeup for his inferior numberswarfare</i>. After that timeCambridge ; Rochester, it was Robert the Bruce who launched invasions on the English and was later recognized as the Scottish king by Edward II's successorN.Y: D.S. Brewer, Edward IIIpg. 107.</ref>
[[File:OutlawFrom that time on, Robert the Bruce had realized to defeat the English he would have to conduct a mostly guerrilla war. This proved to be a very successful strategy as he began to have success in attacking the English in places they did not expect. When he did next meet the English in battle, he wanted to choose the ground where the battle would be. In May 1307, the advantage point for him was at Loudoun Hill, a place that was trapped on either side by marshes.jpeg|thumb|The movie Outlaw King tells While the tale Bruce was aware of Robert this, the English were not. They saw the small Scottish army that was poorly equipped as an opportunity to destroy him and they fell into his trap. The Bruce and his rise forces had also made trenches that restricted English movements to areas that were prepared with spears. Robert the Bruce was attacked by Aymer de Valence, once again, but this time he had made conditions perfect for Scottish thronevictory.<ref>For more on Aymer de Valence, see: Phillips, J. R. S. (1972). <i>Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke, 1307-1324: baronial politics in the reign of Edward II</i>. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ]]</ref>
==Historical Accuracy==While <i>Braveheart</i> has been much criticized for its lack of historical accuracythe movie ends there, it is clear that this was just a turning point. Soon after this battle, Edward II took over England from his father after he had died and not he was far less able to mention how it diminishes fight the role Robert Scots effectively. After more successful operations by the Bruce played in and the war against major defeat of the English, <i>Outlaw King</i> does a generally better job in showing key events until at the Battle of Loundoun Hill. There is still a lot of leeway in the way in which key events are shown and not much agreement as to how they happened. For instanceBannockburn, King where once again Robert is initially shown as reluctant in the movie in accepting that he and the other Scottish nobles are vassals of the English king. There could be some truth Bruce had to use creative tactics to thiscompensate for his inferior numbers, but it is also likely that this stage of his career was part of a larger plan that had been at work for some time. He and the other nobles Scots were soundly defeated and were unable to mount a serious resistance. He had already, for instance, made a pact with William Lamberton to always support each other, possibly to lay effectively broken free from the groundwork for rebellionEnglsh. William Wallace was killed in 1305After that time, but it took was Robert the Bruce an entire year before he who launched his rebellioninvasions on the English and was later recognized as the Scottish king by Edward II's successor, Edward III. In fact<ref>For more on Edward II, see: Warner, K. (2015). <i>Edward I had likely begun suspecting II: the rebellionunconventional king</i>. Stroud, as he asked Robert the Bruce to keep his castle at Kildrummy (Figure 2)Gloucestershire: Amberley.</ref>
Other issues include ====Historical Accuracy====[[File:Side.jpg|thumbnail|left|300px|Figure 2. Kildrummy castle was supposed to be Robert's key home and eventually became the marriage he had with place where Elizabeth, his second wife, was captured by the English. He married her well before (]]While <i>Braveheart</i> has been much criticized for its lack of historical accuracy, and not to mention how it diminishes the role Robert the Bruce played in 1302) he launched his rebellionthe war against the English, rather than around <i>Outlaw King</i> does a generally better job in showing key events until the time Battle of Loudoun Hill. There is still a lot of leeway in the rebellion. The depiction that they only gradually got to know way in which key events are shown and trust each other may not be that accurate much agreement as the marriage was more likely to be similar to Medieval political marriageshow they happened. The depiction of For instance, King Robert is initially shown as reluctant in the Bruce's defeat at movie in accepting that he and the Battle other Scottish nobles are vassals of Methven shows treachery by de Valence was not so much treachery as a clearly bad mistake by the BruceEnglish king. He would or should have known de Valence would likely There could be loyal some truth to the English kingthis, as de Valence but it is also likely that this stage of his career was Englishpart of a larger plan that had been at work for some time. He and the other nobles were soundly defeated and were unable to mount a serious resistance. The He had already, for instance, made a pact with William Lamberton to always support each other major flaw was , possibly to lay the presence of Edward II groundwork for future rebellion well in the Battle advance of Loudoun Hill in the filmrebellion. He would very likely not been there and certainly Edward II would not have challenged William Wallace was killed in 1305, but it took Robert to any fightthe Bruce an entire year before he launched his rebellion. Even if he didIn fact, Edward I had likely begun suspecting the Scots would not have let him escape rebellion, as he did in asked Robert the filmBruce to keep his castle at Kildrummy (Figure 2).<ref>For more on Edward I's and Robert's relationships and conflicts, as he would have been an extremely valuable prizesee: Whyte, J., & Whyte, J. (2016). <i>The Guardian: a tale of Andrew Murray</i>. First U.S. edition. New York: Forge.</ref>
[[File:Side.jpg|thumb|Figure 2. Kildrummy castle was supposed to be Robert's key home and eventually became the place where Elizabeth, his wife, was captured by the English.]]<dh-ad/>
==Key Characters==Robert Other issues include the Bruce was shown as a bravemarriage he had with Elizabeth, heroichis second wife. He married her well before (in 1302) he launched his rebellion, but also opportunistic characterrather than around the time of the rebellion. The depiction that they only gradually got to know and trust each other may not be that accurate as the marriage was more likely to be similar to Medieval political marriages. In many waysThe depiction of the Bruce's defeat at the Battle of Methven shows treachery by de Valence. However, he it was such not so much treachery as a person who won important battlesclearly bad mistake by the Bruce. He also learned from his mistakeswould or should have known de Valence would likely be loyal to the English king, particularly after as de Valence was English. The other major defeats to flaw was the presence of Edward II in the Battle of Loudoun Hill in the Englishfilm. Effectively It is unlikely that he learned that chivalrous battles with the English would never work since they always had the numbers have been there and resourcesEdward II certainly would not have challenged Robert to any fight. Once Even if he did, the Scots would not have let him escape as he did in the Bruce switched to battles film because he can win would have been an extremely valuable prize.<ref>For more on his terms Elizabeth and Guerilla tacticsher marriage to the Bruce, then he began to winsee: Underhill, F. A. (1999). <i>For her good estate: the life of Elizabeth de Burgh</i>. 1st ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press. </ref>
Elizabeth de Burgh was ====Key Characters====Robert the Bruce's second wife who supported her husband and eventually was shown as a brave, heroic, but also opportunistic character. His opportunistic strike made it possible for him to turn the tides of war against the British. He learned from his mistakes, particularly after major defeats to love himthe English. We don't actually know much about her, as Medieval women were rarely recorded He realized that he could not engage in historical documentsany chivalrous battles with the English would never work. She did likely take care The British always had superior numbers and resources, but once the Bruce switched to guerrilla tactics, he changed the tides of his Marjorie war and made it possible for the Scots to win.<ref>For more on Robert the Bruce, who was see: Penman, M. A. (2014). <i>Robert's daughter from his first marriagethe Bruce: King of Scots</i>. However, how brave or inspiring she may have been is not clearNew Haven: Yale University Press. </ref>
John Comyn is shown as a competitive figure to Elizabeth de Burgh was Robert the Bruce's second wife who supported her husband and eventually learned to love him. His character may not have been as negative as was suggestedWe don't actually know much about her, as he may have been opportunistically killed as Robert rose Medieval women were rarely recorded in powerhistorical documents. His loyalty to Edward She did likely take care of Marjorie Bruce, who was no different than the BruceRobert'sdaughter from his first marriage. However, as both were technically under English authority until Robert decided whether she was brave or inspiring is unclear. We do know she was held in captivity for eight years before she was exchanged for prisoners after the Battle of Bannockburn<ref>See earlier reference to make a move and take the Scottish crown for himself. Elizabeth de Burgh</ref>
John Comyn is shown as a competitive figure to Robert the Bruce. His character may not have been as negative as was suggested, as he may have been opportunistically killed as Robert rose in power. His loyalty to Edward was no different than the Bruce's, as both were technically under English authority until Robert decided to make a move and take the Scottish crown for himself.<ref>For more on Comyn and his claim to the Scottish throne, see: Crome, S. (1999). <i>Scotland’s first war of independence</i>. Alford: Auch Books, pg. 77. </ref> Aymer de Valence was certainly a loyal English subject throughout his career rather than someone who betrayed Robert. Aymer's family had noble heritage from the time of the Norman conquest and was of French origin. <ref>See earlier reference to Aymer de Valence</ref>
Edward I and II are both shown as greedy rulers of England who would stop at nothing in subjugating the Scottish kingdom. While perhaps there is some truth to that, they were also usually cautious. Edward I did try to rule Scotland by playing off the Scottish nobles against each other, while his son was likely to be a more indecisive and poor strategic thinker relative to his father.
====Summary====The <i>Outlaw King</i> does a much better job than <i>Braveheart</i> in depicting events that led to the Scottish rebellions that ultimately led to their Scottish independence. The significance of Robert the Bruce is that not only did he lead Scotland to independence but it was through his line that the Scottish monarchy eventually merged with the English kings and became the ancestors of the current British monarch. Robert the Bruce, both his ambition and bravery, were critical to the ultimate success against the English. The key events between the 1290s and 1307, the first major victory against the English, are sometimes glossed over or not displayed to full accuracy. However, the rise of Robert the Bruce in the film does show the difficult political landscape that Robert had to navigate in his rise to power and ultimately obtain the Scottish crownfor himself and family.{{Mediawiki:AmNative}}====References====<references/>
==References==[[Category: Historically Accurate]][[Category:Wikis]][[Category:British History]]

Navigation menu