Changes

[[File<youtube>https: Sack_of_Rome_by_JN_Sylvestre_1890//www.jpg|300px|thumbnail|left|Joseph-Nöel Sylvestre’s 1890 Painting Depicting the Sack of Rome by the Visigoths in AD 410]]__NOTOC__Few scholars would argue that it would by hyperbole to say that the Visigoth sack of Rome in AD 410 was one of the true turning points in world historyyoutube. For Rome, it was the first time that the city had been sacked by outsiders in over 800 years, when the Gauls last did the destructive deed in 390 BC. The Romans recovered nicely from the 390 BC sacking, with the majority of their cultural, political, and military achievements coming after that date. In fact, one could argue that Rome was strong <i>becausecom/watch?v=uhQO6giXAnY</iyoutube> of the 390 BC sacking, as it was forced to reevaluate its military capabilities and how far its northern boundaries should be extended. The sacking in AD 410 was much different, though, as it came at a time when Rome had been in decline for over two centuries. In many ways, the sacking was the death knell of the once great city-state, which limped along for a few more decades before the last emperor of the west was deposed in AD 476.

 [[File: Sack_of_Rome_by_JN_Sylvestre_1890.jpg|200px|thumbnail|left|Joseph-Nöel Sylvestre’s 1890 Painting Depicting the Sack of Rome by the Visigoths in AD 410]]__NOTOC__Few scholars would argue that it would be hyperbole to say that the Visigoth sack of Rome in AD 410 was one of the true turning points in world history. It was the first time for Rome that outsiders had sacked the city in over 800 years when the Gauls last did the destructive deed in 390 BC. The Romans recovered nicely from the 390 BC sacking, with most of their cultural, political, and military achievements coming after that date.  Arguably, Rome was stronger due to the 390 BC sacking, as it was forced to reevaluate its military capabilities and how far its northern boundaries should be extended. The sacking in AD 410 was much different, though, as it came at a time when Rome had been in decline for over two centuries. In many ways, the sacking was the death knell of the once-great city-state, which limped along for a few more decades before the West's last emperor was deposed in AD 476. It is said that Rome was not built in a day, which equally applies to its collapse and the sacking of the city in AD 410. Rome’s sacking was the end result of resulted from a ten -year process of invasions and sieges led by Alaric I (ruled 395-410), king of the Visigoths. Alaric I was able to bring forth unmitigated destruction to Rome due to a number of many factors. The Visigoth king proved to be a great military tactician who possessed a resolute character and was a keen judge of character. On the other side, the Roman Emperor Honorius (reigned 393-423) was weak, inexperienced, and prone to take bad advice, which ultimately led to the death of the only Roman commander who could stop Alaric I.

As a young man, Alaric marched alongside the Emperor Theodosius I (reigned 379-395), eventually acquiring a reputation for bravery, loyalty, and cleverness. Although Alaric was a German and not a Roman citizen, he desired to be a Roman general, which had become a possibility when the requirements for such an office 's requirements changed during the Roman Empire. Still, it was difficult for a German to rise to such a high rank without a benefactor – Alaric believed his he would be none other than the emperor, who was impressed with the young man’s abilities. Unfortunately for Alaric, his dreams of attainting attaining the highest rank in the Roman army were dashed when Theodosius I died.<ref> Bury, p. 64</ref> The young Visigoth warrior would have to look elsewhere for status.

In the year 395, some of Alaric’s ambitions were finally realized when he was elected king of the Visigoths at the age of thirty. The election made Alaric the first true Visigoth king,<ref>Rousseau, Philip. “Visigothic Migration and Settlement, 376-418: Some Excluded Hypotheses.” <i>Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte</i> 41 (1992) p. 335</ref> but it did help him gain entry into the Roman elite. The title of Visigoth king 's title must have seemed like an inferior door prize to Alaric I, because as soon as he was crowned , he set out to punish Rome.

Alaric I led his Visigoth army into Roman territory and for . For a time , it seemed that there was nothing the Western or Eastern emperors could do about it, until the Roman general Stilicho came to the rescue. Like Alaric, Stilicho was actually of German ancestry. Still, but he was from the Vandal tribe and by . By the late fourth century , his reputation as a an excellent tactician and charismatic general preceded him, which eventually resulted resulting in Theodosius I appointing him as the young Honorius’ regent. Honorius later married Stilicho’s daughter Thermania, placing the Vandal firmly in the imperial family. <ref> Sennigen, William B., and Arthur E.R. Boak. <i>The History of Rome to A.D. 565. </i> Sixth Edition. (New York: Macmillan, 1977), p.451</ref> Most now believe that Stilicho was the one who truly held the reins of power in the Western Roman Empire and that he largely controlled Alaric I’s early movements in southern Europe.

Not long after Alaric I was elected king, he lead leads the Visigoth nation into southern Europe, embarking on a thirteen -year orgy of plunder and devastation. The Visigoths first marched into the Balkans region in 397 and were met by little resistance. The emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire, Arcadius (ruled 395-408), was weak like his brother Honorius and totally bereft of any military force that could stop the Visigoths. The Arcadius's only hope that Arcadius had was to appeal to his brother to send Stilicho and his army, but the general decided to sit back for awhile a while to see how the situation transpired.  Alaric I led his Visigoths to ravage Illyrium, Macedonia, and Thrace before he finally arrived with his army in southern Greece. <ref> Bury, pgs. 66-67</ref> The Visigoths returned to their temporary base in Epirus after losing a battle to Stilicho’s forces, but the army was largely still intact. <ref>Burrell, Emma. “A Re-Examination of Why Stilicho Abandoned His Pursuit of Alaric in 397.” <i>Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte</i> 53 (2004) p. 252</ref> Many modern scholars believe that Stilicho manipulated Alaric's entire campaign – the general purposely allowed the Visigoths to plunder the region so that he could be the savior and gain control at the expense of the East. <ref>Bury, p. 79</ref> But Alaric I was not content with mere plunder. He desired to have a territory for his people within the Roman territory, so he decided to bring his request straight to the emperor.

Since no one in either half of the Roman Empire appeared to be listening to Alaric I led , the Visigoth king decided to take his Visigoths grievances straight to ravage Illyrium, Macedonia, the emperor by invading Italy in 401. Alaric and Thrace before he finally arrived with his army ravaged towns in southern Greecenorthern Italy until Stilicho arrived once more to save the day, forcing the Visigoths to accept his terms and leave Italy 402. <ref> Bury, pgsp. 66-6777</ref> The Visigoths returned Alaric did not plan to their temporary base in Epirus after losing a battle to Stilicho’s forcesstay away until his dreams were realized, but the army was largely still intact. <ref>Burrellthough, Emma. “A Re-Examination of Why Stilicho Abandoned His Pursuit of Alaric so he invaded Italy once more in 397.” <i>Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte</i> 53 (2004) p. 252</ref> Many modern scholars believe that Alaric’s entire campaign 403 but was manipulated defeated again by Stilicho – . After the general purposely allowed defeat in 403, Alaric led the Visigoths to plunder back through the region so that he could be the savior and gain control at the expense of the EastBalkans encamped in Epirus for nearly five years. <ref>Bury, p. 7978</ref> But Alaric I was not content with mere plunder, he desired to have a territory for his people within Roman territory so he decided to bring his request straight to the emperor.

Since no one in either half Honorius probably thought he heard the last of the Roman Empire appeared to be listening to Alaricin 403, but Stilicho no doubt knew better. Rome enjoyed the Visigoth king decided to take his grievances straight to seeming stability on Italy’s northern border in the emperor by invading Italy in 401. Alaric and his army ravaged towns in northern Italy until Stilicho arrived once more to save first years of the day, forcing fifth century ended when the Visigoths to accept his terms and leave Italy Rhine River was breached in 402. <ref> Bury406 by a horde of Germanic tribes, pforemost of them were the Vandals. 77</ref> Alaric did not plan Honorius was forced to stay away until send Stilicho and his dreams were realized, though, so he invaded Italy once more in 403, but was defeated again by Stilicho. After best troops to Gaul to fight the defeat in 403new menace, which left Italy’s northern frontier wide open for an ambitious warrior king such as Alaric led the Visigoths back through the Balkans where they encamped in Epirus for nearly five yearsI. <ref> Bury, p. 7881</ref>

Honorius probably thought he heard the last In 408, Alaric I led his Visigoth army out of Epirus to Noricum on Italy’s northern border, where they camped and sent an embassy to Rome. Alaric I demanded 4,000 pounds of gold to fight against a usurper who challenged Honorius in 403Gaul. The young emperor was not happy about the situation, but he was pressured to accept Stilicho no doubt knew better. The seeming stability that Rome enjoyed on Italy’s northern border in 's demands, who understood the first years extent of the fifth century ended when Visigoth’s military capabilities. <ref> Bury, p. 84</ref> The payment had the Rhine River was breached in 406 by a horde effect of Germanic tribestemporarily mollifying Alaric’s demands for Roman land, foremost but it also led to the formation of them were the Vandalsa palace conspiracy. Honorius A palace official named Olympius spread a rumor that Stilicho was forced plotting to send usurp the Eastern throne on behalf of his son. Many since Stilicho was a German, the rumors were believed, and his best troops it seemed to Gaul many that the commander was doing little to fight stop the new menaceGerman Alaric. As proof, which left Italy’s northern frontier wide open for an ambitious warrior king such as the conspirators pointed to the large gold payment Alaric Ireceived, facilitated by Stilicho. The conspiracy gained strength until Stilicho was captured and beheaded on August 22, 408. <ref> BuryMatthews, J. F. “Olympiodorus of Thebes and the History of the West (A.D. 407-425).” <i>Journal of Roman Studies</i> 60 (2004) p. 8183</ref>

In 408, Alaric I led his Visigoth army out of Epirus to Noricum on Italy’s northern border, where they camped and sent an embassy to Rome. Alaric I demanded 4,000 pounds of gold in return for fighting against a usurper who challenged Honorius in Gaul. The young emperor was not happy about the situation, but he was pressured to accept the demands by Stilicho, who understood the extent of the Visigoth’s military capabilities. <ref> Bury, p. 84</ref> The payment had the effect of temporarily mollifying Alaric’s demands for Roman land, but it also led to the formation of a palace conspiracy. A palace official named Olympius spread a rumor that Stilicho was plotting to usurp the Eastern throne on behalf of his son. The rumors were believed by many since Stilicho was a German and it seemed to many that the commander was doing little to stop the German Alaric. As proof, the conspirators pointed to the large gold payment that Alaric received, which was facilitated by Stilicho. The conspiracy gained strength until Stilicho was captured and beheaded on August 22, 408. <ref> Matthews, J. F. “Olympiodorus of Thebes and the History of the West (A.D. 407dh-425).” <i>Journal of Roman Studies</i> 60 (2004) p. 83<ad/ref>

Stilicho’s assassination was the worst imaginable thing that could have happened to Honorius. Stilicho was his most able commander and the only person in his army who appeared to have the ability to defeat Alaric. The Visigoth king clearly also had a high level of respect for Stilicho and was willing to listen to him. Stilicho’s assassination was followed up by an anti-German pogrom where Roman troops massacred the families of German auxiliaries' families. The events only hardened Alaric’s resolve and increased the size of his army 's size when 30,000 German survivors joined him in Noricum. <ref> Bury, p. 91</ref>

Despite the violent turn of events and the general lack of respect , the Romans showed to him and his people, Alaric I continued to hope that he could come to some sort of permanent deal with Honorius. He promised to withdraw to Pannnonia Pannonia if another sum was paid and hostages were exchanged, but the young emperor flatly refused. <ref> Bury, p. 91</ref> Alaric was done negotiating.

After Alaric’s final offer was denied, he invaded Italy for a third time in the fall of 408. The Visigoths burned and pillaged numerous towns unopposed until they finally reached the walls of Rome. <ref> Bury, p. 92</ref> Alaric I then ordered that all roads in and out of Rome be blockaded as well as river access to Ostia. Unfortunately for Alaric I and the Visigoths, though, Honorius was safely ensconced in the Ravenna's imperial residence in Ravenna, which meant that the king had to deal with the Senate. Alaric I soon found the Senate to be just as weak and feckless as the emperor and unable to grant him any of the major concessions he desired. When he realized that the Senators did not have the power to give his people land, Alaric I played on their desperate situation and demanded nearly all of the alienable property in the city from its starving citizens. The sixth -century Byzantine historian, Zosimus, summarized the negotiations:

Although Alaric’s siege of Rome was financially successful, he was could still unable to secure land within the Roman Empire for his people. He was not finished with Rome , and by 409 , his war had taken on a more personal note that was directed at Honorius. Alaric sieged Rome again in 409, forcing the Senate to accept his puppet, Priscus Attalus, as emperor. The move had the desired effect of pressuring Honorius to come to the negotiating table, but Alaric was attacked on the way to the negotiations. <ref> Bury, p. 96</ref> Alaric deposed of Attalus, who was no longer of any use to him, and took his force to Rome once more, but this time the Visigoths would lay waste to the city. After camping outside of the city, the Visigoths gained entry on August 24, 410 , through guile. According to the sixth -century Byzantine historian Procopius, the Visigoths gained entry through a Germanic Trojan Horse.

“He chose out three hundred whom he knew to be of good birth and possessed of valour valor beyond their years, and told them secretly that he was about to make a present of them to certain of the patricians in Rome, pretending that they were slaves. And he instructed them that, as soon as they got inside the houses of those men, they should display much gentleness and moderation and serve them eagerly in whatever tasks should be laid upon them by their owners; and he . He further directed them that not long afterwardsafterward, on an appointed day at about midday, when all those who were to be their masters would most likely be already asleep after their meal, they should all come to the gate called Salarian and with a sudden rush kill the guards, who would have no previous knowledge of the plot, and open the gates as quickly as possible. . . But when the appointed day had come, Alaric armed his whole force for the attack and was holding held them in readiness close by the Salarian Gate; , for it happened that he had encamped there at the beginning of the siege. And all the youths at the time of the day agreed upon came to this gate, and, assailing the guards suddenly, put them to death; then they opened the gates and received Alaric and the army into the city at their leisure.” <ref> Procopius of Caesarea. <i>History of the Wars.</i> Translated by H.B. Dewing. (London: William Heinemann, 1916), Book III, ii, 14-24</ref>

The Visigoths raped, robbed, and pillaged Rome and the Romans for two days but left all of the Christian churches intact. As a parting shot, Alaric I took the emperor’s sister as a hostage and left the vicinity. <ref> Bury, pgs. 96-97</ref> Although Alaric I died shortly after the sack of Rome and his dream of a Visigoth homeland within the Roman territory was never realized, his

Alaric I, king of the Visigoths, is a well-known historical personality because of his sack of Rome in AD 410. The event changed the course of history as it hastened the decline of the Roman Empire's decline, but numerous factors contributed to make making it a reality. The general weakness of the Roman Empire at the time and more specifically the weakness of Emperor Honorius were among the most important factors – in earlier periods, when Rome was strong, foreign armies could rarely get close to Rome, never mind sack the city. The death of the Roman general Stilicho should also not be overlooked. Stilicho was an able general and tactician who routinely defeated Alaric and the Visigoths on the battlefield. The general was also a diplomat and moderator who more than once brought the Visigoths and Romans to the negotiating table. After Stilicho died, there was no longer a voice of reason in the conflict. Finally, the abilities of Alaric I and his army played the a pivotal role. Alaric knew when to use brute force and when to use guile , and cunning, which allowed him to win numerous battles and to ultimately sack the ancient world's greatest city of the ancient world.

* Bury, J. B. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393003884/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0393003884&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=674cc418da52757c6a23d9153bed4b30 The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians]. </i> (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967) * Sennigen, William B., and Arthur E.R. Boak. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/151159859X/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=151159859X&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=30e0c8a670cab9eddaa81a763aee31d9 The History of Rome to A.D. 565] </i> 6th Ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1977) * Kyle Harper, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691166838/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0691166838&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=8847a0d9567c7a46530e846eddf769f7 The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire]</i> (Princeton University Press, 2017) * John Boardman, edit. Jasper Griffen, Oswyn Murray, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0192802038/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0192802038&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=cf273774d1bac11c72c7b6dba59f6ce1 The Oxford History of the Roman World]</i> (Oxford University Press, 2001) * Bryan Ward-Perkins, ''[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0192807285/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0192807285&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=0aa209b468427b0b72f5320e69fcd25c The Fall of Rome: and the End of Civilization]'' (Oxford University Press, 2006)