Changes

Jackson strongly favored removing As the 6019th century began,000 Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw land-hungry Americans poured into the backcountry of the coastal South and Creek began moving toward and Seminole (into what would later become the Civilized Tribes) from North Carolina, Georgia, states of Alabama, Florida and MississippiIn Jackson’s first message . Since Indian tribes living there appeared to be the main obstacle to Congress - he asked for funds westward expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them. Although Presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe argued that the Indian tribes in the Southeast should exchange their land for lands west of the Mississippi====Opposition River, they did not take steps to Indian Removal====Triggered make this happen. Indeed, the creation first major transfer of a reform movement - Catherine Beecher (later Stowe) started a land occurred only as the largest petition movement at the that time“The William Penn Essays” was a anti-removal Treatise and became extremely well-knownMartin Van Buren was surprised by the level result of oppositionAnti-removal reform movement led many activists to abolitionismwar.

====Indian Removal Act of 1830Native Americans faced increasing pressure from Western Expansion====Despite public opposition - In 1814, Major General Andrew Jackson ensured that Congress passed bills that removed led an expedition against the Creek Indians climaxing in the Battle of Horse Shoe Bend (in present day Alabama near the Georgia border), where Jackson’s force soundly defeated the Creeks and gave Jackson destroyed their military power. He then forced upon the ability Indians a treaty whereby they surrendered to set aside Western landsthe United States over twenty-million acres of their traditional land—about one-half of present day Alabama and one-fifth of Georgia. Over the next decade, Jackson believed that led the way in the Indian removal was “just and humane” because it would leave campaign, helping to negotiate nine of the eleven major treaties to remove Indians free from influence . Under this kind of pressure, Native American tribes—specifically the statesJackson saw anti-removal movement as hypocritical considering Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw—realized that they could not defeat the treatment Americans in war. The appetite of the settlers for land would not abate, so the Indians adopted a strategy of appeasement. They hoped that if they gave up a good deal of their land, they could keep at least some a part of it. The Seminole tribe in Florida resisted, in the NorthSecond Seminole War (1835–1842) and the Third Seminole War (1855–1858), however, neither appeasement nor resistance worked. Compared From a legal standpoint, the United States Constitution empowered Congress to Clay “regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.” In early treaties negotiated between the federal government and the Indian tribes, the latter typically acknowledged themselves “to be under the protection of the United States of America, and others - of no other sovereign whosoever.” When Andrew Jackson was more humane regardingbecame president (1829–1837), he decided to build a systematic approach to Indian removal on the basis of these legal precedents. ====Why Remove Native Americans?====[[File:Andrew_Jackson_by_Ralph_E._W._Earl_1837.jpg|thumbnail|275px|left| Andrew Jackson (1837) by Ralph E. W. Earl]]Why was Jackson so committed to removal? Jackson fundamentally believed that Native Americans represented a serious security risk to the United States. Jackson had taken part in the United States campaign against members of the Creek nation who followed Tecumseh in 1814. Tecumseh believed that the United States represented an existential threat to not only Creek tribe, but all Native Americans in the United States. Tecumseh lead a simple Indian haterrevolt against the United States to push back the advance of American settlers. Tecumseh's revolted was defeated at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend in 1814, but he Jackson had already decided that Native Americans and US settlers could not live together peaceful. As a result the Tecumseh's defeat, Jackson imposed terms on the entire Creek nation that removed them from their ancestral lands.  Native Americans also held some of the farmlands in the Southeast United States. Several of these tribes had already begun to farm these lands and earnest and make them productive. Both states and settlers wanted to seize these agricultural lands from the Native Americans. The states, such as Georgia, cared little that Native Americans had placed farms on these lands, purchased slaves, or built homes. The tribes did not believe that recognize the states authority over their lands, because they should be assimilated like Jeffersonviewed themselves as independent nations. <div class="portal" style='float:right; width:35%'>====Related Articles===={{#dpl:category=History of the Early Republic|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=6}}</div> ====Andrew Jackson and The Removal Act 0f 1830====Jackson also believed strongly favored removing the 60,000 Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Creek and Seminole (the Civilized Tribes) from North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Mississippi. Indian Removal was one of Andrew Jackson's most important goals. It was so important that Indians were inferior during Jackson’s first message to Congress, he asked for a bill and reinforced notions funds to move these tribes west of racial supremacythe Mississippi. Jackson did little to compensate 's message was clear, Indians for lost lands or homes (typically only received 10% needed to 20% permanently removed west of their value)Louisiana.  In Jackson provided woefully insufficient funds 's 1830 message to ensure Congress he stated: <blockquote> "The consequences of a safe relocation - while Trail speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves. The pecuniary advantages which it promises to the Government are the least of its recommendations. It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of Tears occurred after his administration he set the policies Indians. It will place a dense and civilized population in motionJackson was also outraged large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters...Rightly considered, the policy of the claim by General Government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous. He is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the Cherokees that they were General Government kindly offers him a sovereign nation - unconstitutional new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and unrealisticsettlement."He believed that no new state could be created </blockquote> The first piece of legislation passed after Jackson took office was the 1830 Indian Removal Act. The 1830 Act was just a first step in the jurisdiction of a statelong process that forced Native American off their land to make way white settlers.

The Cherokee Nation resisted, however, challenging in court the Georgia laws that restricted their freedoms on tribal lands. In his 1831 ruling on Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall found declared that the court lacked jurisdiction “the Indian territory is admitted to hear the case because the Cherokee nation was compose a “domestic, dependent nation.”Cherokee Nation was not sovereign authority under Article 3 of Constitution and were wards part of the federal governmentIn Worcester v. GeorgiaUnited States, Marshall somewhat challenged his own ruling from a year before ” and held affirmed that Georgia laws violated Cherokee treaties, commerce clause, and sovereign authority of the Cherokee nation. Georgia had created a law that required whites on Cherokee lands to register with state authoritiesSeven missionaries tribes were arrested for being in Cherokee lands “domestic dependent nations” and sentenced “their relation to 4 years hard labor Marshall created the United States resembles that of a mess with ward to his two contradictory rulingsguardian.Did not require ” However, the law to be enforcedBest described as an effort by Marshall to avoid staining his legacy without creating a direct conflict with following year the Executive BranchSupreme Court reversed itself and ruled that Indian tribes were indeed sovereign and immune from Georgia laws. President Jackson nonetheless refused to accept heed the Worcester ruling and essentially ignored itCourt’s decision. Became moot when Marshall died and he was replaced by Jackson ally and pro-removal Roger TaneyMissionaries were freed after a few months

====Early RemovalThe Treaty of New Echota Splits the Cherokee Nation====[[File:Trails_of_Tears_en.png|left|thumbnail|400px|left|Map showing A minority faction of the trails Cherokee nation led by John Ridge realized that Indians were forced there was little they could do to follow during Removal]]Most prevent removal from their lands. Instead of fighting it, they decided to negotiate a treaty with the United States to get the southern tribes gave up best terms possible. The Cherokee Nation divided on between Ridge's Treaty Party and John Ross's National Party. A delegation was sent to negotiate a Treaty and moved westSeminoles they ultimately were promised $5 million dollars and fugitive slaves who lived with them the right to hold the lands in modern- resisted day Oklahoma in perpetuity. Ridge's group agreed to the terms and received approval from the moveStarted Treaty Party in New Echota. Congress then ratified against the Second Seminole War (protests of Daniel Webster and Henry Clay in 1835-1842)Approximately 3. The Cherokee signing party represented only a faction of the Cherokee,000 people (evenly split between Seminoles and US the majority followed Principal Chief John Ross in a desperate attempt to hold onto their land. This attempt faltered in 1838, when, under the guns of federal troops and Georgia state militia, the Cherokee tribe were killed)3,000 Seminoles forced to move west - a small group remained in Floridathe dry plains across the Mississippi.

Cherokees had split on the issue of removal.Some members of the tribe left early and cherry -picked some of the best lands in Oklahomawhile others resisted forced removal. Chief John Ross supported passive resistance, but it accomplished little. Martin Van Buren forcibly organized the removal of 18,000 Native Americans between 1838 and 1839. Anyone who resisted removal was imprisoned and then forcibly removed 18. Due to the lack of preparation and funding by the United States government, 4,000 CherokeesIn 1838-39died from exposure, the 18starvation,000 and disease on their way to Oklahoma. The Cherokees were herded west and 4named this forced march "the trail on which we cried,000 died on " aka the wayTrail of Tears.  The Federal government never adequately funded removalPeople starved and Trail of Tears is one of the most devastating disasters in American history. More people died on the Trail of disease Tears than from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, or the way west1906 San Francisco fire.

In To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a history full process whereby the President could grant land west of civil rights violations - the Mississippi River to Indian Removal was one tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. As incentives, the law allowed the Indians financial and material assistance to travel to their new locations and start new lives and guaranteed that the Indians would live on their new property under the protection of the most egregiousIndians United States Government forever. With the Act in place, Jackson and his followers were removed simply because states wanted free to take over productive farming operations created persuade, bribe, and threaten tribes into signing removal treaties and leaving the Southeast. With the exception of a small number of Seminoles still resisting removal in Florida, by Indiansthe 1840s, from the Atlantic to the Mississippi, especially Georgiano Indian tribes resided in the American South.  Numbers In general terms, Jackson’s government succeeded. By the end of his presidency, he had signed into law almost seventy removal treaties, the result of which was to move nearly 50,000 eastern Indians to Indian Territory—defined as the region belonging to the United States west of the Mississippi River but excluding the states of Missouri and Iowa as well as the Territory of Arkansas—and open millions of acres of rich land east of the Mississippi was minimal after removalto white settlers. Despite the vastness of the Indian Territory, the government intended that the Indians’ destination would be a more confined area—what later became eastern Oklahoma. Through a combination of coerced treaties and the contravention of treaties and judicial determination, the United States Government succeeded in paving the way for the westward expansion and the incorporation of new territories as part of the United States. [[Category:US State Department]] [[Category:Wikis]][[Category:United States History]] [[Category:History of the Early Republic]] [[Category:19th Century History]] [[Category:Political History]] [[Category:Diplomatic History]][[Category:Native American History]] * Select portions of this article are republished from [https://history.state.gov/| Office of the Historian, United States Department of State]* Article: [https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/indian-treaties| Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830]