How historically accurate is the Gladiator?
This article contains spoilers.
Gladiator was a film released in 2000 starring Russell Crowe that focused on General Maximus Decimus Meridius, who was enslaved after escaping his execution for not supporting the new Roman emperor Commodus (starring Joaquin Phoenix). Maximus rises as a well-skilled gladiator, eventually making it to Rome, where he participates in the gladiator games sponsored by Commodus. After Commodus learns of Maximus, both characters want to kill the other. Maximus attempts to conspire with those in the Senate who dislike Commodus, while Commodus attempts to have Maximus killed in the gladiator battles.
Battles in Germania
The movie begins with the ailing Marcus Aurelius, Rome's emperor, watching Maximus leading a battle against a German tribe. The battle is portrayed as crucial in bringing peace to the Roman Empire's northern frontier. The German tribe was shown wearing Neolithic period clothing, which is inaccurate, and the clothing would have been more complex in fashion. During the reign of Aurelius, there were prolonged wars in Germania.
Although they were close to annexing Moravia and West Slovakia during his reign, wars there were largely inconclusive. The movie depicts the emperor being killed by his son Commodus, although Commodus was already co-emperor. There is no evidence that Commodus had any difficult relationship with his father, although later authors did disparage Commodus. Furthermore, although Maximus is mostly a fictional character, it is not likely Marcus Aurelius would appoint a general as protector of the empire, as suggested in the movie where shortly before his death, the fictional Marcus Aurelius asked Maximus to lead the empire.
In fact, in the film, a conflict in Marcus Aurelius' mind was whether to return power to the Senate rather than have it mostly be with the emperor. This is unlikely as Marcus Aurelius, although often considered a wise emperor and even called the "philosopher-king," as suggested in the film, still believed in holding power closely and willingly passed power to his son, something a Roman Emperor had not done for about a century.
Marcus Aurelius appointed his son as successor long before he died in 166 (he died in 180 CE), making it clear that Commodus was his choice all along. He also died in Vienna (ancient Vindobona), but the film showed him dying in Germania during the campaign. Some rumors and stories did circulate that Commodus did kill his father, but this could have been later stories created to malign the emperor Commodus since he was not well-liked by the Senate, as suggested in the film. The appointment of Commodus was controversial, as shown in the film. From historical documents, mainly in the writings of Cassius Dio, there is an indication that Marcus Aurelius was disappointed in his son, suggesting he had some trepidation about him. Cassius Dio indicates that Rome suffered as Commodus came to power, but this could be part of later propaganda after Commodus's reign. It is hard to tell what is exactly accurate as Commodus may have been more disliked by the upper classes. At the same time, some indication suggests he was popular with the army or even lower classes as a sort of peoples' emperor.
Were Gladiator Contests shown in Gladiator Accurate?
In the film, after Maximus was taken as a slave, but not before he discovered that Commodus killed his wife and son, he was shown as being transported and eventually enslaved as a gladiator in a far away, a remote province in the Roman Empire (somewhere in the Middle East or North Africa). While the circumstances of how Commodus became emperor in the film are probably not true, there is some greater truth in some gladiator fights. For instance, gladiator contests did often reconstruct famous battles or scenes using characters from history or legends. Gladiator contests did take place in many places around the empire. Animals, such as tigers, were often used in arenas, where gladiators might fight each other and animals.
Excavations at the Colosseum showed a variety of exotic animals were present there. This included: bears, lions, hyenas, elephants, wild boar, buffalo, tigers, bulls, wolves, and leopards. The gladiators' clothing, particularly the helmets, were likely, not true and were stereotypes taken from later periods.
Gladiators, as suggested in the film, we're treated like rock stars. Those who were successful could gain favors, such as having access to women and even earn their freedom. However, unlike the film, contests often did not result in the death of contestants. Animals, in fact, were more often killed in contests. This may have been de-emphasized in the film. The emperors did use their thumbs at times to determine if a gladiator should die or live, although we do not know if this was thumbs up for a living and thumbs down for getting killed. It could have been the other way around.
The Colosseum (Figure 1) was the premier event for gladiator contests after its construction in 70-80 CE. Ambitious trainers, similar to how the film depicts it, would try to situate themselves to compete in main events that promised large financial rewards. Like sport today, the gladiator games had a lot of money exchange hands around the events. This revolved around gambling on the matches but also rewarded the owners from the gladiator slaves, which is one reason why the mass killing of gladiators may not have occurred that often.
Something not shown in the film is that gladiator contests may have looked familiar to us. Gladiators often were used to sponsoring products, and billboards often hung in the stadium where contests would have been held. These advertisements were not shown in the film, mostly because the producers thought film audiences would not believe it since it is so similar to our modern sports.
In the film, after Maximus was captured trying to revolt against the emperor. He was shown as fighting the emperor in a one on one contest. This match would have never happened. First, Commodus died in a coup event in 192 rather than at Maximus's hand, as shown in the final combat scene in the film. Second, Commodus, as shown in the movie, did fight in the arena. However, he probably only fought in events where he has assured victories against animals or crippled captives. The film does suggest this as Commodus does mortally wound Maximus before their fight when Maximus was tied and unable to defend himself.
Nevertheless, historians indicate he liked to think of himself as Hercules, and even began to dress like him in gladiator contests rather than as the emperor, where he wore bright emperor clothing in the film.
Related DailyHistory.org Articles
- Who was Asclepius: Greek god of medicine?
- Who was the Roman God Janus?
- How Did the Seleucid Empire Collapse?
- What was the role of the the war god Mars in Rome?
- How Did the Term “Pyrrhic Victory” Originate?
- Why did Romulus kill Remus?
- How Did Historiography Evolve in the Hellenic World?
- Category:Roman Republic
- How Did the Romans Conquer the Etruscans?
- Top Ten Books on the Bubonic Plague
- Top Ten Books on Julius Caesar
- How Did Gladiatorial Games Evolve in Ancient Rome?
Who was Maximus Decimus Meridius Based On?
Maximus Decimus Meridius: Maximus is an entirely fictitious character but seems to be based on several characters, including Avidius Cassius, a general in Marcus Aurelius' armies. He declared himself emperor shortly after thinking Aurelius died in 175, suggesting a brief power struggle. Still, he was eventually killed after it became clear Aurelius was not dead. A general named Maximus lived in the late Roman Empire who may have inspired Gladiator's story of a revolt against an emperor.
Who were the Real People portrayed in Gladiator?
Commodus: While Commodus is a historical figure who did hold gladiator contests and may have been mentally unstable, as depicted in the film, he did, in fact, rule the Roman Empire for 12 years. Among the odd things Commodus did was rename the months and legions after himself (he had twelve names he went by). He even named the Roman people after himself. He was purported to have held naked gladiator contests, which would have outraged some Roman citizens and contributed to his bad reputation and eventual downfall. He may have killed 100 lions in a day during his gladiator contests and other exotic animals such as elephants. Even by Roman standards, the level of slaughter may have caused outrage.
He even started killing many disabled people in the arena, which may have been one of the final straws before he was assassinated. However, his political actions were also likely unwise. He tried to declare himself consul and gladiator, where the former is an elected position and the latter usually only slaves should hold. Narcissus, his wrestling partner, eventually killed him in 192 as part of a larger conspiracy by Roman leaders.
Lucilla: She was Commodus' sister, and in the film, she was depicted as trying to encourage the conspiracy against her brother. She did conspire to kill Commodus but failed in 182, leading to her death. Unlike what the film depicts, Lucilla was probably ambitious to be a co-ruler with her husband (she is shown as a widow in the movie), which is why she may have conspired against her brother. However, she may not have considered herself a possible ruler until she witnessed her erratic brother's behavior. Unlike the film, Commodus probably did not seek to have an incestuous relationship with his sister.
Marcus Aurelius: The emperor's relatively positive reputation has likely contributed to his depiction in the film as a wise ruler (i.e., the philosopher-king) who tried to avoid appointing his son. However, despite his son's destructive nature, Marcus Aurelius was willing to choose Commodus to be his successor and heir. The film depicts Marcus Aurelius lamenting his many wars, but in reality, Marcu Aurelius would have seen these wars as his duty to Rome. He was influenced by Stoic philosophy, which believed in wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance.
Conclusion and Accuracy
There were many historical inaccuracies in the film. The historians who were hired to advise the movie quit or refused to be given credits because of the many historical inaccuracies the final version had. Nevertheless, as with most historical dramas, this movie was more about entertainment than historical narrative.
The overall narrative of a somewhat crazy emperor in Commodus was correct. Oddly enough, the reality of Commodus' reign was probably more outrageous than what was shown in the film, as the emperor often made himself dress as a gladiator and fought numerous contests with animals and others, such as wounded gladiators.
If you want to learn more about gladiators, check out our article How Did Gladiatorial Games Evolve in Ancient Rome? for more information.
- For more on Marcus Aurelius, see Birley, A. R. (2016). Marcus Aurelius: a biography. Place of publication not identified: Routledge.
- For more on Commodus and his life, see: Adams, G. W. (2013). Emperor Commodus: Gladiator, Hercules or a tyrant? Boca Raton: BrownWalker Press.
- For more on the gladiator games in the Roman Empire, see: Dunkle, R. (2008). Gladiators: violence and spectacle in ancient Rome.. 1st ed. Harlow, England ; New York: Pearson/Longman.
- For more on gladiator traditions, see Winkler, M. M. (Ed.). (, 2004). Gladiator: film and history. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
- For more on the Colosseum and venues for gladiator contests, see: Aldrete, G. S. (2008). Daily life in the Roman city: Rome, Pompeii, and Ostia (Oklahoma paperback ed). Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.
- For more on advertising in the Roman world, see: Bomgardner, D. L. (2002). The story of the Roman amphitheater. London; New York: Routledge, pg. 55.
- For more on Commodus' gladiator contests, see: Adams 2013: 242
- For more on Avidius, see: Canduci, Alexander (2010). Triumph & Tragedy: The Rise and Fall of Rome’s Immortal Emperors. Roman imperial biographies. Sydney: Pier 9.
- For more on Commodus, see: Adams 2013.
- For more on Lucilla, see: Lightman, M., Lightman, B., & Lightman, M. (2008).A to Z of Ancient Greek and Roman women. (Rev. ed). New York: Facts On File, pg. 195.
- For more on Marcus Aurelius as the philosopher-king, see: McLynn, F. (2010). Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, philosopher, emperor. London: Vintage Books.