Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Fact and fiction the Battle of Hastings (1066)?

No change in size, 15:50, 12 March 2019
no edit summary
====The reason for Harold's defeat====
The Anglo-Saxons were forced to march south at speed in the wake of their victory over the Norwegian King Harald Hardrada and his Anglo-Saxon allies at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. This was a bloody clash , and the forces of Harold suffered many numerous casualties even though they he decisively defeated the Viking army. Then the The victors at Stamford Bridge then had to make a forced march from the north of England to the south coast , and it is widely argued that this was a contributory factor in the Anglo-Saxon defeat.  However, not all historians agree with this , and they point out to the fact that the army of Harold fought very well during the battle. Indeed, even in the Norman accounts they all show the Anglo-Saxons as fighting fiercely, from early morning until the evening. Based on the distance between the two battles it would seem that the Anglo-Saxon army marched 27 miles (39 km) a day, but that they had a day’s rest before the battle fight.<ref>Marren, p 201</ref>. Indeed, Harold was able to seize the high ground and establish a strong defensive position on the battlefield. It is not correct to state that the fact that the Anglo-Saxons were tired after their forced march and earlier battle and that this led to their defeat at the hands of the Normans.
====The course of the Battle of Hastings====

Navigation menu