Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Evolutionary Science before Charles Darwin

213 bytes added, 21:14, 22 November 2018
m
insert middle ad
__NOTOC__
====CLASS, EDUCATION, & EVOLUTION====
[[File:lamarckgiraffe.jpg|400px|left|thumbnail|Lamark's giraffe]]
The few decades preceding the publication of Charles Darwin’s ''[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0486450066/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0486450066&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=69b2f35bde91f0a7071d1c0b2594219b On the Origin of Species]'' in 1859 played an important role in setting the stage for how Darwin’s treatise would be received amongst the general public. It is during this time that the working classes, in Britain and most of Western Europe, as well as America, were developing their own sense of identity. A new class unity was slowly forming, founded upon principles of separateness from the upper classes, or as British historian EP Thompson puts it, “the consciousness of an identity of interests as between all these diverse groups of working people and as against the interests of other classes.”<ref> Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class.</ref>
====CLASS, EDUCATION, & EVOLUTION====
Crucial to this new consciousness was the recognition of the power of knowledge and education. A combination of factors, ranging from new types of schooling to the wide readership of “penny” newspapers had created a more literate and political working class. The middle and upper classes feared that the tight grip they had on knowledge and its distribution was being loosened by men who had hitherto been mostly apathetic insofar as education and schooling were concerned.
[[File:darwinfinches.jpg|400px|left|Darwin's explanation of finch evolution]]
Geology was another popular topic of study among gentlemen naturalists of the Victorian era. While studying the geological formations of the earth, most learned men of science felt compelled to reconcile their findings with biblical teachings, as was standard during this time. The Bible held that the earth was 6000 years old, so any and all discoveries made by geologists must somehow fit into this timeframe. “Catastrophism” – the theory that changes in the Earth’s crust resulted from sudden violent and unusual events – was the name of the game during this time as this theory was easily reconcilable with the biblical account of Earth’s creation. This theory held that mountains and valleys were formed during catastrophic events, over a short period of time; these catastrophic events were responsible for the various layers of sediment and fossils. The so-called “gentlemen scientists” of the Victorian era had no problem reconciling their findings with their Christian beliefs, as biblical accounts like Noah’s flood were seen as perfect examples of catastrophic events that had shaped the earth’s crust.
 
<dh-ad/>
Catastrophism enjoyed widespread popularity among the men of science during the Victorian era until a Scottish lawyer and amateur geologist named Charles Lyell came along. Lyell’s ''Principles of Geology'' (1830-33) was perhaps the most important work on geological science ever published. In this three-volume book, Lyell used a slew of geological findings to strengthen his argument for his new theory: Uniformitarianism. This theory changed the very foundation of geological science – Lyell provided almost irrefutable proof that the Earth was older than 6000 years. With Lyell’s theory, the Earth went from being a young planet whose crust was shaped by catastrophic events, to an ancient planet whose layers had developed over vast periods of time. But this didn’t happen overnight. As we shall soon see, the idea of an Earth that was millions, or even billions, of years old was a crucial element in Darwin’s development of the theory of natural selection.
<references/>
{{Contributors}}
[[Category:History of Science]][[Category:19th Century History]][[Category:British History]][[Category:European History]][[Category:Wikis]]

Navigation menu