Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
m
==Introduction==__NOTOC__[[File: DOMITIAN ONE.jpg|200px|thumb|left|Bust of Domitian]]Domitian (51-86 AD), is considered to be viewed as one of the most tyrannical Emperors in Roman history. In Historical sources from the surviving sources, he has been Roman era painted him as a vicious tyrant. However, in the modern eraover time, the view of Domitian has changed, and he shifted. He is no longer seen as some monster, rather he but is now regarded by many as contributing to the stability and prosperity of the Roman Empire. This article will explore the life and career of Domitian and his impact on the Roman World. It will demonstrate that Domitian’s reign was not only a tale of repression but also one of reform and good government. This Emperor was an authoritarian figure who marginalized the Senate and the Roman elite and wanted to become an absolute ruler. However, he was also an able administrator, who secured the frontiers of the Empire and helped to lay the foundations for the peace and prosperity in the 2nd century AD, in the Roman World.
Domitian’s reign was not only a tale of repression but also one of reform and good government. Domitian was an undoubtedly an authoritarian figure who marginalized the Senate and the Roman elite and sought to become an absolute ruler. Despite his authoritarianism, he was also an able administrator, who secured the frontiers of the Empire and helped to lay the foundations for the peace and prosperity of the Roman Empire during the 2nd century. ====Background====Domitian was born in Rome in 51 AD, the youngest son of Vespasian, the future Emperor. His older brother was the future Emperor Titus. Vespasian held many important offices including that of Consul and was in favor with several successive Emperors , and indeed Domitian was educated at the Imperial Court. Domitian’s father was always absent , and in 66 AD, Vespasian was appointed to lead the campaign to end the Jewish Revolt. In 68 AD Nero committed suicide after a conspiracy ousted him from power and there followed a period of anarchy in Rome and in the provinces. This The following year , 69 AD , the Empire saw no less than four separate Emperors. Galba first ascended the throne, after Nero and he was rapidly succeeded by Otho, who was later deposed by Vitellus.  In the meantime, Vespasian took some of the legions that were concluding the war in Judea and marched on Rome. During 69 AD, Domitian was placed under house-arrest and his life was regularly in danger. Vespasian’s army defeated the legions of Vitellus at the Second Battle of Cremona and made their way to Rome.<ref>Tacitus, <i>The Histories, 1 i</i></ref>. At this the time, Domitian was forced to go about in disguise in fear for his life as Vitellus still controlled the city. In December 69 AD, Vespasian entered Rome and was acclaimed Emperor by the Senate and this was the beginning of the Flavian Dynasty .<ref>Tacitus, <i>The Histories, 1 I </i> </ref>. Domitian did not play an important part essential role in the government of Vespasian and he was denied any military commands, unlike his elder brother Titus. After the successful triumphant reign of Vespasian (79 AD), the elder son became Emperor and he was like his father , he was an effective ruler. Domitian was a rather somewhat peripheral figure at throughout this timeperiod. However, Titus died in 81 AD and Domitian was pronounced suddenly Domitian has acclaimed declared Emperor as he was the only surviving male member of the House of Flavius. Some have alleged There were whispers that he Domitian had a hand in the death of his brother and predecessor Titus's death.[[File: DOMITIAN ONE |200px|thumb|left|alt text]]==== Reign of Domitian====When Domitian became emperor , he moved the seat of government to the Imperial Court. This was a very important symbolic move , and it demonstrated that Domitian had little interest in sharing power with the SenatorsSenate. He made it clear that he wanted to rule as an autocrat, but he also sought He quickly moved to reform the Senate and expelled expel corrupt senators. Like Augustus , he wanted to renew Rome and had . Had appointed himself appointed censor and tried sought to reform the morals of the general population.  He was also deeply concerned with by the decline in observance of the old Roman religion , and he personally patronized the cult of Minerva. Domitian appears appeared to have favored members of the Equestrian Order (Knights) and they were promoted them to high office and this . This infuriated many in the Senate. It appears that Domitian valued both merit and ability and he did not practice opposed nepotism but . He selected men only primarily based on their abilities. Unlike previous Emperors, Domitian was often out of Rome , and he regularly visited the Provinces.<ref>, Suetonius, <i>Life of Domitian, xiv, iv</i></ref>.  However, he did not neglect the welfare of Rome and its citizens , and he paid attention to the food and water supply. He was also a lavish builder , and he constructed several villas and palaces in Rome , and their ruins are still extant. He also built a stadium for the use of the public and rebuilt large areas of the city that had been destroyed in fires. Domitian was a very able administrator , and he took a personal interest in affairs of state and personally monitored the bureaucracy. <ref>Suetonius, <i>Life of Domitian, xiv, iv</i></ref>.  The third Flavian ruler was interested in the economy and was prudent in fiscal matters. Like every other Emperor , his first duty was the preservation of the Empire and the security of its frontiers. Domitian did not personally lead his legions into battle although he regularly visited battle zones. During his reign , his legions campaigned in Germany, Britain and the Balkans. Domitian was faced with a very serious grave threat from the Dacians , and his legions were able to beat back their attempted invasion. The Flavian Emperor was disliked by many in the Senate and he disliked that body . The disdain was mutual, Domitian loathed the Senate and was very suspicious of the Senators.<ref> Jones., Brian, <i>The Emperor Domitian </i> (London: Routledge, 1992), p 14 </ref>.  During the later years of his reign , he became increasingly paranoid , and he had several Senators executed for treason .<ref>Suetonius, <i>Life of Domitian, xiv, iv</i></ref>. There was no free speech in Rome towards the end of his reign and . The historian Tacitus claims claimed that there was a reign of terror in the city and throughout the Empire. As a result, many in the elite elites wanted to replace Domitian, but it must be remembered that he Domitian was very popular with the ordinary people of Rome average Romains and the legionnaires.  Despite thishis popularity, Domitian’s paranoia increased, and he had one of his most-loyal officials executed for treason. This led other court officials to intrigue with Senators and the Praetorian Guard to assassinate him. In December 96 AD the conspirators attacked and stabbed Domitian to death. Hours after his death the Senate acclaimed Nerva as Emperor, which suggests that he was involved in the conspiracy.<ref> Jones, p 113 </ref>. [[File: DOMITIAN ONE.jpg|200px|thumb|left|alt text]]====Domitian and the conception of the Imperial Office==Domitian had a very different conception of the role of the Emperor than his father and his brother. He saw the Emperor as a moral force who should intervene to promote the wellbeing and the morals of the population, just as Augustus had. For example, he passed laws limiting luxury and extravagant spending in the city. He enforced the laws against adultery, mutilation, and public immorality for the first time in decades<ref>Suetonius, Life of Domitian, xiv, iv</ref>. Domitian saw himself as the embodiment of Rome and his duty was to the people and not to the Senate. He was eager to marginalize the Senate and his frequent absences increasingly meant that the assembly was irrelevant. His policy of promoting Equestrians was also designed to keep the Senatorial elite from many high offices. Under him the Imperial government became more autocratic and he signed himself as ‘Dominus’ or master <ref> Jones, p 178</ref>. Under Domitian the Republican façade that was established by Augustus was torn away. He extended the law of treason and any criticism of him was treasonous and this was unprecedented. After his assassination, Nerva and his successors, at least respected the façade of the Republic<ref> Jones, p 201</ref>. However, Domitian’s autocratic reign was a forerunner of those 3rd and 4th century Emperors who ruled without any regard to the Senate and the Roman constitution. ==
[[File: DOMITIAN TWO.jpg|200px|thumb|left|Bust of the Emperor Vespasian]]
Domitian had a very different conception of the role of the Emperor than his father and his brother. He saw the Emperor as a moral force who should intervene to promote the wellbeing and the morals of the population, just as Augustus had. For example, Domitian passed laws limiting luxury and extravagant spending in the city. He enforced the laws against adultery, mutilation, and public immorality for the first time in decades.<ref>Suetonius, <i>Life of Domitian, xiv, iv</i></ref> Domitian saw himself as the embodiment of Rome, and his duty was to the people and not to the Senate. He was eager to marginalize the Senate, and his frequent absences increasingly meant that the assembly was irrelevant. His policy of promoting Equestrians was also designed to keep the Senatorial elite from many high offices.  <dh-ad/> Under him, the Imperial government became more autocratic, and he signed himself as ‘Dominus’ or master.<ref>Jones, p 178</ref> Under Domitian the Republican façade that was established by Augustus was torn away. He extended the law of treason and any criticism of him was treasonous, and this was unprecedented. After his assassination, Nerva and his successors at least respected the façade of the Republic.<ref>Jones, p 201</ref> However, Domitian’s tyrannical reign was a forerunner of those 3rd and 4th-century Emperors who ruled without any regard to the Senate and the Roman constitution. ====The Economy and the Administration====Perhaps the greatest achievement of Domitian was in his administration of the Empire. Even his biographer Suetonius who wrote an unflattering portrait of the last of the Flavians admitted that he was a great administrator and that the Imperial government was run very efficiently during his reign. Moreover, his efforts to remove the Senators from high office seems to have led to a reduction in corruption and led to the establishment of a very professional bureaucracy. Domitian helped to lay the foundation for an administration that was to serve the Empire very well and contributed much to the stability of the Roman World after his death.<ref>Jones, p 301</ref>.  Moreover, his reform of the coinage and the tax system was very importantsignificant. He raised the value of silver in the Roman coinage and this increased trust in it , and this stimulated trade and commerce .<ref>Syme, Ronald "The Imperial Finances under Domitian, Nerva , and Trajan". The Journal of Roman Studies. 20 (1930) , pp 55–70 </ref>. Moreover, the strong currency ensured that inflation was kept in checked and this benefitted the entire economy. Domitian’s reform of the tax system helped to generate more revenues for the Empire , and this helped to finance in future years the campaigns of Trajan and the many construction projects Hadrian. Without the last of the Flavians fiscal reforms the achievements of the Roman World in the 2nd century AD many have never have occurred.<ref> Syme, p. 67</ref>.  ====Military Achievements of Domitian====[[File: DOMITIAN TWOTHREE.jpg|200px|thumb|left|Bust Some of the Emperor Vespasianruins of the Stadium of Domitian]]==Military Achievements of Domitian==The Emperor had himself acclaimed as Imperator or victor at least twenty times. During his reign , there were important campaigns against in Britain, Germany , and the Balkans. Initially, his general Agricola conquered a large area of northern Britain and Scotland.<ref>Tacitus, <i>The Agricola, xv</i></ref>. However, Domitian ordered him to abandon most of his gains. This was because he was conscious of the need to establish a rational defensive line in Britain. Tacitus, the great Roman historian , believed that Agricola could have conquered all of Scotland and even Ireland with the support of the Emperor .<ref>Tacitus, Agricola, xv</ref>.  However, Domitian followed the policy of Augustus he was focused on protecting and strengthening the Imperial frontier, rather than expansion. This was also the case with his campaigns in Germany where he sought only to counter the threat posed to the frontier by German tribes such as the Chatti. These defensive campaigns were often regarded as defeats in the sources who were all hostile to the last of the Flavian Emperors. However, the most controversial of Domitian’s campaigns were in the Balkans where he had to deal with the threat posed by the powerful Dacian kingdom.<ref>Suetonius, xiv, iii</ref>. In 85 the Dacians, led by King Decebalus, invaded the province of Moesia and they killed the governor. A Domitian ordered a counter-attack was ordered by Domitian , and this drove the Dacians back, but a punitive invasion of their territories resulted in the defeat of a large Roman army. Domitian rushed to the Danube frontier and reorganized the frontier provinces. He also ordered another invasion of Dacia , and in 88 AD, the legions inflicted a heavy defeat on King Decebalus and even threated his capital, Sarmizegetusa. It seems that Domitian was about to conquer the Dacians , but trouble on the Rhine forestalled this.  A treaty was signed, and Dacia became a client kingdom of Rome, but the Empire was obliged to pay Decebalus a subsidy. This was a curious arrangement and many of the sources, including Suetonius and Tacitus , claim that the payments made to the Dacians were a form of tribute and indicate indicated that Domitian was defeated on the Danube. The Roman Emperor had neutralized the Dacians , and they were reduced to the status of a clients of the Emperor. The Domitian strategy in the Balkans were was a success , and it helped to secure the Danube frontier. What is more, according to many modern historians, believe that the last of the Flavian Dynasty laid down the foundation for the eventual conquest of Dacia by Trajan .<ref> Adrian Goldsworthy, <i>Adrian. In the Name of Rome </i> (London, Orion, 2004), p. 298</ref>.[[File: DOMITIAN Three.jpg|200px|thumb|left| Some of the ruins of the Stadium of Domitian]]====Conclusion====Domitian was portrayed in the Roman sources as a tyrant whose paranoia and viciousness eventually led to his assassination. The Flavian was an autocrat , and he did ignore the Senate and rendered it powerless. His conception of the rights as an enlightened autocrat who was there to guide the Empire was one that was to be very influential over time. His military achievements were not significant. Domitian largely followed the example of Augustus and sought only to secure the frontiers from invaders and raiders. He did not seek conquest, but security and he did strengthen all the frontiers of his sprawling Empire. This was a considerable achievement. Perhaps his great achievement was his economic policies and his management of the Empire, these helped to stabilize the Empire. Domitian was in many ways a tyrant, however, only the Senators suffered his wrath. In the main he was an effective leader of the Roman Empire who helped to lay the foundation for the Roman achievements in the second century AD. ==Recommended Reading==Pat, Southern, Pat. Domitian: Tragic Tyrant (London, Routledge. 1972)
SymeHe did not seek conquest, Ronald (1930)but security and he did strengthen all the frontiers of his sprawling Empire. This was a considerable achievement. Perhaps his great achievement was his economic policies and his management of the Empire; these helped to stabilize the Empire. "The Imperial Finances under Domitianwas in many ways a tyrant. However, Nerva and Trajan"only the Senators suffered his wrath. The Journal In the main, he was an effective leader of the Roman Studies. 20: 55–70Empire who helped to lay the foundation for the Roman achievements in the second century AD.
====Recommended Reading====* Pat, Southern, Pat. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H1S1670/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B00H1S1670&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=7b3880d741a39d891dcbf1dd14168630 Domitian: Tragic Tyrant]</i> (London, Routledge. 1972)* Syme, Ronald (1930). "The Imperial Finances under Domitian, Nerva and Trajan". <i>The Journal of Roman Studies</i>. 20: 55–70.* Brian W. Jones. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FBFBFI/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B000FBFBFI&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=eccdd0f739c5972bdaea8256d9b220d9 The Emperor Domitian ]</i> (London: Routledge, 1992)* Brian Jones. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0871691329/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0871691329&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=4c6bec807043d8074a5ba075c818231d Domitian and the Senatorial Order: A Prosopographical Study of Domitian's Relationship With the Senate, A.D. 81-96]</i> (New York, Amer Philosophical Society, 1979)* David Corson. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0595089372/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0595089372&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=49163586e5b30bde0942bfb953167151 Domitia and Domitian]</i> (London, Writer's Showcase Press, 2000).
Brian Jones Domitian and the Senatorial Order: A Prosopographical Study of Domitian's Relationship With the Senate, A.D. 81-96 (New York, Amer Philosophical Society, 1979)====References====<references/>
David Corson. Domitia and Domitian (London, Writer's Showcase Press, 2000).==References==[[Category: Roman History]][[Category:Ancient History]][[Category:Wikis]][[Category:Roman Empire]]

Navigation menu