15,697
edits
Changes
m
<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTjUu1Bt29o</youtube>
Admin moved page How historically accurate is the movie the Kingdom of Heaven? to How historically accurate is the movie the Kingdom of Heaven
Moreover, after the fall of Jerusalem, Guy still had a claim on the Crusader states' kingship through his wife, Sybilla. He remained in the former Kingdom of Jerusalem and began a civil war in a desperate bid to become king but was defeated. Ultimately, he was forced to flee from the Holy Land. Despite his repeated failures, he was able, after he fled, to seize control of the island of Cyprus and become its lord. He even established a dynasty, and his successors ruled the islands as kings until the Ottomans took control in 1476.<ref> Edbury, Peter. The Kingdom of Cyprus and the Crusades, 1191–1374 (Cambridge, 1991), p 22 </ref>
== Is the <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> realistic? ==
Despite its rocky start, <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> after the Director’s Cut release has been hailed by critics and discovered by audiences. Remarkably, the movie does a good job balancing historical accuracy and telling a story. The historical background and major events such as the Battle of Hattin are portrayed fairly. It does a good explaining the decline and fall of the First Kingdom of Jerusalem. The nature of warfare at the time is shown very well. Moreover, it does present a realistic portrait of Saladin. In essence, this the type of historical accuracy most movies should strive for.
Critical opinions of <i>Kingdom of Heaven</i> are pretty mixed. Whatever you do, avoid the theatrical release version and watch the longer edition released on blu-ray.
====Further Reading====