15,697
edits
Changes
no edit summary
===The campaigncharacters===The movie was very committed to show All the real campaign and characters in general, it does illustrate how the battle unfoldedfilm are based on historical figures. It does somewhat simplify what happened but it gives a good overview of the fighting and the operation. The first day of the campaign went well and the allied paratroopers seizedSean Connery played his fellow Scot, several key targets including several bridgesMajor General Urquhart. By the second day, the paratroopers began to take heavy casualtiesGene Hackman played Polish General Stanislaw Sosabowski. It also correctly shows Ryan O Neill had the contribution role of the Dutch Resistance to the Allied causeGeneral James Gavin, while Dirk Bogarde played Lt Gen. In one memorable scene, we see Dutch resistance fighters using dead bodies for barricades and this occurred"Boy" Browning. The Germans These characters were able to respond very quickly to the airborne attacks. In one scene key players in the movie, the Germans are shown as detonating explosives that they had rigged to a bridgeOperation Market Garden. This is what happened. The movie also shows very accurately the ferocity of the German resistance. It shows how the Germans could slow down the advance of the Irish Guards as they tried to move forward along the narrow Dutch roads<ref> RyanMacKenna, p. 234216</ref>. The geography of Holland helped the German defenders because the British tanks could not drive off the roads because of the many canals. This meant that the Nazis inflict heavy casualties commanders are all based on those who were involved in the advancing allies and fatefully slowed down their advance. The moviefighting, which is quite long even for a Hollywood blockbuster shows nearly all the key battlesexample, Lieutenant General Wilhelm Bittrich, including how the Americans were able to capture the bridge at Nijmegen by rowing across the river and attacking the Germans from behind. The movie shows very accurately the importance of the SS 9th and 10th Division and how they helped to pin down the British at Arnhem. Without the intervention of the elite SS troops, the British would have been able to secure their objective commander at Arnhem, that is to secure the bridge until an armored divisor arrived. However, the SS with their tanks were too much for the lightly armed paratroopers. The significance of Arnhem to Operation Market Garden is also shown in the film. A Bridge Too Far correctly shows that the British and Americans captured all the bridges except the key one at Arnhem and this is correct <ref>Badsey, Stephen. Arnhem 1944: Operation Market Garden (London: Osprey Publishing, 1993), p. 267</ref>movie. IndeedHowever, Browning claims in the movie that the operation General Karl Student was 90% as a result. However, the movie shows that because the British paratroopers could not hold the Bridge at Arnhem the offensive was demonstrated to be a failure. The rest of the allied army did not reach them in time and this led to their near annihilation by commander on the SS. Attenborough’s movie shows Operation western front when Market Garden to be a failure and this commenced it was the case. This is the view held by the Allied High Command at the time and by historians sinceVon Rundstedt.
==Who was to blame=Intelligence disaster===The movie seems to lay much [[File:Arnhem.jpg|300px|thumb|left| Captured British paratroopers at Arnhem, 1944]]One of the blame main reasons for the failure of Operation Market Garden on Browning. In was the fact that many senior officers simply ignored the movie, he is shown as not a very likable character, which seems to have been warnings from the caseDutch Resistance. In The British and Montgomery had believed that the book upon which the movie is based the ultimate blame for the failure of Market Garden Germans were all but defeated and that their morale was placed on Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery low.<ref>Ryan, p. 40137</ref>. Most historians would agree with this. In the movie, Montgomery is missing and not even shown on screen. At the end of the movie, He also believed that the character of Browning is shown criticizing Montgomery’s tactics and orders. While Browning made many mistakes, including ignoring the intelligence, but the real blame for the failure of Market Garden lay with Montgomery. It was his idea that airborne forces should be used to secure a narrow strip of territory in Holland which would be used to hold key bridges were only lightly defended which would allow the Allies to cross the Rhine, the Nazi’s regime last line of defense in the west <ref>Badsey, p. 214</ref>. The only strategy was too ambitious and the ideas of holding territory with lightly armed airborne troops were somewhat reckless and misguided. Earlier in the warcorrect, in Crete, the Germans had learned this lesson and they had abandoned the idea of airborne attacks for large-scale military operations. Montgomery but he did not heed this and instead produced a plan consider that had a high likelihood of failure. The movie somewhat spares Montgomery and this is unfair. It seems likely that Attenborough knew that if they blamed the great British hero that it would be controversial and bad for box office. The movie also does not show the unpleasant way that the British commanders tried to place some of the blame for the failure on the Polish commander Stanislaw Sosabowskithere were substantial German forces near these bridges. In fact, he Von Rundstedt had opposed ordered two SS divisions to the plan area around Arnhem for rest and had wanted his men to be dropped into his native land to help the Polish Resistance to liberate their country from the Nazisrefitted. <ref>BadesyRyan, p. 28934</ref>. [[File:1200px-Shooting The Dutch Resistance had informed the British of a scene from A bridge too farthis.jpg |200px|thumb|left| shooting a scene in the movie]]
Furthermore, the British intelligence service had passed on evidence that corroborated the Dutch claims to the Allied high command. They had solid evidence that the Germans had regrouped in the Arnhem area and were a formidable fighting force. In the movie Lieutenant General Frederick Browning, commander of the airborne operation is shown ignoring warnings. Major Fuller, an intelligence officer, shows Browning (Dirk Bogarde) photos of the Panther and Tiger tanks but even this does not stop the Operation. Browning refused to accept that there were German divisions in the target areas. In fact, Browning despite being told by his own intelligence officer that SS panzers were located near Arnhem, did not even order that the paratroopers landing in the area be equipped with any anti-tank weapons<ref> Ryan, p. 114</ref>. Browning is shown as placing any officers who called for the Operation to be canceled such as the intelligence officer, on sick leave, which is correct. The anger of the Dutch Resistance when their intelligence was ignored is also true. The series of intelligence failures that led to the disaster at Arnhem is portrayed in the movie very accurately. ===The campaign===The movie was very committed to show the real campaign and in general, it does illustrate how the battle unfolded. It does somewhat simplify what happened but it gives a good overview of the fighting and the operation. The first day of the campaign went well and the allied paratroopers seized, several key targets including several bridges. By the second day, the paratroopers began to take heavy casualties. It also correctly shows the contribution of the Dutch Resistance to the Allied cause. In one memorable scene, we see Dutch resistance fighters using dead bodies for barricades and this occurred. The Germans were able to respond very quickly to the airborne attacks. In one scene in the movie, the Germans are shown as detonating explosives that they had rigged to a bridge. This is what happened. The movie also shows very accurately the ferocity of the German resistance. It shows how the Germans could slow down the advance of the British unit, the Irish Guards, as they tried to move forward along the narrow Dutch roads<ref> Ryan, p. 234</ref>. The geography of Holland helped the German defenders because the British tanks could not drive off the roads because of the many canals. This meant that the Nazis inflicted heavy casualties on the advancing allies and fatefully slowed down their advance. The movie, which is quite long even for a Hollywood blockbuster shows nearly all the key battles, including how the Americans were able to capture the bridge at Nijmegen by rowing across the river and attacking the Germans from behind. <dh-ad/> The movie shows very accurately the importance of the SS 9th and 10th Division and how they helped to pin down the British at Arnhem. Without the intervention of the elite SS troops, the British would have been able to secure their objective at Arnhem, that is to hold the bridge until an armored division arrived. However, the SS with their tanks were too much for the lightly armed paratroopers. The significance of Arnhem to Operation Market Garden is also shown in the film. A Bridge Too Far correctly shows that the British and Americans captured all the bridges except the key one at Arnhem and this is correct.<ref>Badsey, Stephen. <i>Arnhem 1944: Operation Market Garden</i> (London: Osprey Publishing, 1993), p. 267</ref> Indeed, Browning claims in the movie that the operation was 90% successful as a result. However, the movie shows that because the British paratroopers could not hold the Bridge at Arnhem the offensive was a costly failure. The rest of the allied army did not reach them in time and this led to their near annihilation by the SS. Attenborough’s movie shows Operation Market Garden to be a failure and this was the case. This is the view held by the Allied High Command at the time and by historians since. ===A Bridge Too Far===<i>A Bridge Too Far</i> was the title of Ryan’s book upon which the movie was based. The phrase a Bridge Too Far accurately sums up the reason for the defeat of the allied advance. In the movie, this phrase is uttered by Browning. This is correct and he did indeed say it. However, in the movie he speaks the phrase at the end of Operation Market Garden after the Allied efforts to take the bridge at Arnhem had failed. In fact, Browning used the phrase a Bridge Too Far in conversation with Montgomery before the Operation started. He had some misgivings about the ambitious strategy of Montgomery and he stated that he was worried about the timetable and that if the attack was delayed that Arnhem could prove to be a Bridge Too Far. <ref>Ryan, p. 123</ref>. The Polish General Stanislaw Sosabowski also had genuine doubts and stated that he too feared that the Bridge at Arnhem could not be reached in time. This is accurately shown in the movie. ===Who was to blame===[[File:1200px-Shooting of a scene from A bridge too far.jpg |300px|thumb|left|Shooting a bridge scene from in the movie]]The movie seems to lay much of the blame for the failure of Operation Market Garden on Browning. In the movie, he is shown as not a very likable character, which seems to have been the case. In the book upon which the movie is based the ultimate blame for the failure of Market Garden was placed firmly on Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery.<ref>Ryan, p. 401</ref> Most historians would agree with this, but Montgomery is noticeably missing from the movie. At the end of the movie, the character of Browning is shown criticizing Montgomery’s tactics and orders. While Browning made many mistakes, including ignoring the intelligence, the ultimate blame for the failure of Market Garden lay with Montgomery. It was his idea that airborne forces should be used to secure a narrow strip of territory in Holland which would be used to hold key bridges which would allow the Allies to cross the Rhine, the Nazi’s regime last line of defense in the west.<ref>Badsey, p. 214</ref> The strategy was too ambitious and the idea of holding territory with lightly armed airborne troops was somewhat reckless and misguided. Earlier in the war, in Crete, the Germans had learned this lesson and they had abandoned the idea of large-scale airborne operations by paratroopers. Montgomery did not heed this and instead produced a plan that had a high likelihood of failure. The movie somewhat spares Montgomery and this is unfair. It seems likely that Attenborough knew that if they blamed the great British hero that it would be controversial and bad for box office. The movie also does not show the unpleasant way that the British commanders tried to place some of the blame for the failure on the Polish commander Stanislaw Sosabowski. In fact, he had opposed the plan and had wanted his men to be dropped into his native land to help the Polish Resistance to liberate their country from the Nazis.<ref>Badesy, p. 289</ref> ===How accurate is the movie===Hollywood has a long history of getting it wrong on history. It usually sacrifices Movies often sacrifice truth to enchance entertainment and box-office appeal. This is not the case with Attenborough’s <i>A Bridge Too Far</i>. It is very accurate and gives a good account of Operation Market Garden, its battles and most of the reasons as to why it failed. The movie’s portrayal of the battles is particularly accurate and shows the intensity of the fighting. Although there are some minor inaccuracies about units and armaments. The motion picture does show all the leading players in Market Garden and the only real omission was Montgomery who was the architect of Operation Market Garden. Indeed, this is perhaps the main failing of the movie. It The movie also noticeably fails to show who was ultimately responsible for the failure of Market Garden. Browning rejection of the intelligence offered by the Dutch Resistance and his own intelligence service was critical. However, Montgomery must take a the major share of the blame for the disaster and this is not shown in the motion picture. The movie is historically accurate however, it is argued by many critics that this made the film less dramatic, entertaining, repetitive and overlong. {{Template:Survey1}} [[Category:Historically Accurate]][[Category:World War Two History]][[Category:Military History]][[Category:20th Century History]][[Category:Wikis]] ===ReferenceReferences===<references/>